<u>Answer</u>: No, we do not have sufficient evidence to conclude that the mean call duration, µ, is different from the 2010 mean of 9.4 minutes.
Step-by-step explanation:
As per given , we have
, since 
is two-tailed so , the test is a two tail test.
Since population standard deviation is unknown, so we use t-test.
Critical value (two-tailed) for significance level of 0.01= 
For n =50 , 
and s= 4.8
Test statistic : 
Since test statistic value (-1.18) lies in critical interval (-2.609228, 2.609228), it means the null hypothesis is failed to reject.
We do not have sufficient evidence to conclude that the mean call duration, µ, is different from the 2010 mean of 9.4 minutes.
Answer:
h = -0.3d^2 + 1.2d + 1.5
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:35x
Answer:
Eric rode 2 more miles per week than Kim rode.
Step-by-step explanation:
Find how many miles per week Kim rode by dividing the number of miles she rode by the number of weeks:
135/9
= 15
Find how many miles per week Eric rode:
102/6
= 17
So, Kim rode 15 miles per week and Eric rode 17 miles per week.
The answer is Eric rode 2 more miles per week than Kim rode.
Answer:
7/6
Step-by-step explanation:
The width to length ratio is ...
... width / length = (4 2/3 yards)/(4 yards) = (14/3)/4 = 14/12
... width/length = 7/6
