X = 0.3
1/0.3 = 3
:D hope this helps you
Given:
Budget = $30
cost of pizza = $9
cost of drinks = $1
number of pizza = p
number of drinks = d
pizza and drinks should only be equal to or less than the budget of $30.
$9p + $1d <u>< </u>$30
unit cost of pizza : 9
unit cost of drinks : 1
total cost of set (p & d) 10
pizza = 9/10 x 30 = 27 total cost of pizza
drinks =1/10 x 30 = 3 total cost of drinks
27 ÷ 9 = 3 number of pizzas to order
3 ÷ 1 = 3 number of drinks to order
To check:
9p + 1d <u>< </u>30
9(3) + 1(3) <u>< </u>30
27 + 3 <u>< </u>30
30 <u>< </u>30
<h2>
Answer with explanation:</h2>
Given : In a restaurant, the proportion of people who order coffee with their dinner is p.
Sample size : n= 144
x= 120

The null and the alternative hypotheses if you want to test if p is greater than or equal to 0.85 will be :-
Null hypothesis :
[ it takes equality (=, ≤, ≥) ]
Alternative hypothesis :
[its exactly opposite of null hypothesis]
∵Alternative hypothesis is left tailed, so the test is a left tailed test.
Test statistic : 

Using z-vale table ,
Critical value for 0.05 significance ( left-tailed test)=-1.645
Since the calculated value of test statistic is greater than the critical value , so we failed to reject the null hypothesis.
Conclusion : We have enough evidence to support the claim that p is greater than or equal to 0.85.
Answer: A reflection across the x-axis keeps the x-coordinates the same but flips the signs of the y-coordinates. So, it should be the opposite for a reflection across the y-axis. The y-coordinates remain the same, but the signs of the x-coordinates change.
Step-by-step explanation
I copy and pasted the answer