Solve it please with explanation Marty simplified the expression 2(x - 2) - 2(3) as 2x - 8. Is he correct? Explain why or why no
t.
2 answers:
Answer: Marty is not correct
Step-by-step explanation:
2(x-2)-2(3) use distributive property
2x-4-6
2x-10
Marty is not correct
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
<u>Let's check his work by simplifying the given expression.</u>
- 2(x - 2) - 2(3)
- => 2x - 4 - 6
- => 2x - 10
When I compare Marty's result and this result, they are un-equal. Hence, Marty is incorrect.
<u>Marty's mistake</u>
- Marty must've got the problem wrong because of not understanding the distributive property.
- He probably forgot to multiply -2 by 2. Instead, he only subtracted 2 when he should've subtracted 4 from 2x.
You might be interested in
Answer:
The correct answer is B
Step-by-step explanation:
$45,700 loss
First you multiply 450 m ×300 m= 135,000 m
Then you convert to Kilometers 135,000 ÷1,000= 135 Kilometers
So the answer is 135 Kilometers
Answer:
39
Step-by-step explanation:
Formula for the nth term (an) = a1 + d(n - 1) where a1 = the first term and d = common difference.
So here the 13th term = 3 + 3(13 - 1)
= 3 + 3*12
= 39 (answer).
Answer:
Gavin earned $450
Step-by-step explanation:
If Seiji Earned $425 25+25=50
Answer:
If im correct from the way this is set up, I believe it is C
Step-by-step explanation:
