The answer here is A as they both tried to excommunicate each other while in fact neither of them knew what was going to happen.
Hope this helps!
Ed rivers created it . hope it helps(((:
Answer:
The ONE major difference between Wood’s and Bailyn’s historical interpretations of why the American colonies rebelled against the British is:
According to Wood, the American colonies rebelled and revolted out of reasoned principle. They had the mindset that they were "born heirs of freedom" and that freedom is their everyday life. While, according to Bailyn, the colonies rebelled and revolted due to the rise of conspirators who stood against their freedom.
Explanation:
Wood's and Bailey's historical interpretations of why the American colonies rebelled against the British can be seen from the excerpt. It's evident that their interpretations differ.
Wood revealed that the Americans didn't rebel due to suffering but due to a "reasoned principle". Whereas, Bailey interpreted it to be that the conspirators against the liberty propelled the revolt.
Answer:
Civil liberties are freedoms guaranteed to us by the Constitution to protect us from tyranny (think: our freedom of speech), while civil rights are the legal rights that protect individuals from discrimination (think: employment discrimination)
Explanation:
Answer:
I would say A due to what I wrote below but im not to sure so please check but im sure its A
The conflicts that arose between pro-slavery and anti-slavery settlers in the aftermath of the act's passage led to the period of violence known as Bleeding Kansas, and helped paved the way for the American Civil War (1861-65).
Explanation:
