B) It is unnecessary to oversee the athletes involved in mixed martial arts.
The viewpoint made in section one is that "State athletic commissions should strictly monitor and regulate the UFC." A rebuttal statement is one that goes against the viewpoint, so it needs to say something about how the UFC should not be monitored or regulated. Option A agrees with the viewpoint by saying overseeing athletes is necessary. Option B states the opposite by saying it is unnecessary to oversee athletes. Therefore, this is the correct answer. Option C says that athletes must self-regulate. While this puts the responsibility of regulating on the athletes, it does not take it away from the commissions. There is nothing here to suggest that the commissions would not regulate just because the athletes are. Option D has nothing to do with monitoring or regulating so it is a poor choice.
Answer:
The answer is has been
Explanation:
One of my students has been reprimanded for misconduct.
Hope it helps.
Answer: you need to take in that there might be counter arguments you need to have proof or evidence of some sort, and you also need strong visual language.
Explanation:
Answer:
c it is a metaphor because the school is not actually a garden of eden but it seems like it to old monk.
Answer:
The author should be included
