Depends on what Richie did and how old is Richie.
When contrasting life-course persistent offenders with adolescent-limited offenders, researchers agree that: the causes and consequences of the two are very different.
One of the strongest correlates of crime is age, with a common empirical finding of an adolescent rise and peak of offending. One theory in particular, Moffitt’s developmental taxonomy, advances a specific hypothesis for the age–crime relationship, with a focus on a specific typology of offenders, adolescence-limited who offend for specific reasons during adolescence. This chapter reviews the adolescence-limited hypothesis relevant empirical research, and concludes with summary statements, challenges to Moffitt’s adolescence-limited hypothesis, and directions for future research.
There are other theories that have been developed to explain the rise and peak of adolescent offending. Patterson (1997) set out a learning model in which decreases in parents monitoring and supervision during adolescence lead adolescents to offend. Another explanation is Agnew’s (2003) integrated theory of the adolescent peak in offending. Recalling that adolescents are given only some adult privileges and responsibilities, Agnew believes that this has important effects on increasing delinquency among adolescents, including a decline in supervision increased social and academic demands participation in a larger, more diverse peer-oriented social world an increase in the desire for adult privileges, and reduced ability to cope in a legitimate manner and an increase in the disposition to cope in an illegitimate (delinquency/crime) manner to attain the adult privileges and goods they want
Learn more about contrasting life-course persistent offenders
brainly.com/question/6258097
#SPJ4
Answer: television is an attention grabber it’s loud, it’s colorful, and it’s distracting.
Explanation: The reason for this is our brains process information but not all of us have a great attention span for instance those of us who have watched TV often enough will begin to mimic things we see on TV we store that information into our brain for longer than we would if someone had just explained it face-to-face. The reason for this is our brains process information but not all of us have a great attention span for instance those of us who’ve watched TV often enough will begin to mimic things we see on TV we store that information into our brain for longer than we would if someone had just explained it face-to-face
Help us to understand our own evolution is what anthropologists learn about humans by studying other primates, like chimpanzees or apes
This is further explained below.
<h3>What are
anthropologists?</h3>
Generally, The study of other primates, such as chimpanzees and apes, teaches anthropologists things about humans that, among other things, help them better comprehend human evolution.
In conclusion, We refer to this all-encompassing strategy for gaining knowledge of the many facets of the human experience as "holism." Anthropologists follow this approach. They do this by using archaeology to go into the past and try to piece together how human societies used to live hundreds or thousands of years ago and what was significant to them.
Read more about anthropologists
brainly.com/question/17595144
#SPJ1
