Answer:
The answer is 60%
Explanation:
Labor force is the total number of people that have job(employed) and the number of people who are willing, able and actively searching for job(unemployed) in a population.
Labor force participation rate is calculated by dividing the labor force by the noninstitutionalized population.
Labor force = employed + underemployed + unemployed
= 96 + 31 + 8
=135 million
So we have:
(135 ÷ 243) x 100 percent.
60% (the nearest whole percentage)
Answer:
Materials quantity variance and labor efficiency variance.
Explanation:
Material quantity variance is defined as the difference that exists between the actual amount of a material that is used in production and the expected amount to be used. It measures the efficiency with which a raw material is converted into product.
MQV is calculated by multiplying standard price of material by difference between standard quantity and actual quantity.
Labour efficienct rate on the other hand measure efficiency of using labour.
It is calculated by multiplying standard labour rate with difference between standard labour amount and actual labour amount.
Answer:
Explanation:
Effect of crowding out:
The crowding out phenomena describes the economic phenomena in which an increase in government public spending leads to reduced or perhaps may eliminate of private investment.
Multiplier:
The multiplier represents the ratio of income to investment change.
Given that:
$13 billion increase in government spending will lead to a $52 billion
The rise in demand for goods & service will be the value of multiplier which is
= 52/13
= 4
To determine the multiplier using the formula:
Multiplier = 1 /( 1- MPC)
4 = 1/(1 - MPC)
4 (1 - MPC) = 1
(1- MPC) = 1/4
-MPC = 0.25 - 1
MPC = 0.75
Marginal propensity to consume = 0.75
I believe that this problem has the
following choices:
> a debit of $2,500 to
Merchandise Inventory.
> a credit of $2,500 to Sales.
> a debit of $1,900 to
Merchandise Inventory.
> a credit of $1,900 to Cost of
Goods Sold.
The correct answer from the choices
is:
<span>> a credit of $2,500 to Sales
</span>
<span> </span>
Answer:
The correct answer is the option C: give too much weight to a small number of vivid observations.
Explanation:
To begin with, in the case that a close friend had told you that he had a bad experience in a certain place, a restaurant in particular this time, does not states the fact that it will always be like that for every person that goes to that place because it may have been a bad day for the employees and that impacts at their work while if you go any other day every detail is taking care nicely. Therefore that the people give too much weight to small number of vivid observations due to the fact that the article published in the newspaper must have been made with over dozens of observations and comments, not just one, and the major agreement is that those places are good ones to go to eat.
