Answer:
Check the following explanation
Explanation:
Let us consider Porter’s Five forces strategy, in analyzing the particular scenario of Bank and that of the firm which produces T3MP chemical.
As the bank is an early mover in the issuance of ATM cards, the bank definitely got the competitive advantage. As an early mover, the bank faced very low threat of new entrants with regard to distribution of ATM cards. Therefore, the bank could capture a large area of urban region. Also, the switching cost for bank customers is quite high and in the case of banks, generally the individual customers prefer to stick to one or two banks. As an early mover, this was definitely an advantage to the bank. As a result, the bank also got a loyal customer base in the long run. When the brand loyalty was combined with the high switching cost of bank products; in terms of ATM, the entry of a potential competitor was difficult for the bank. Since the ATM cards are unique to each customer and bank, the ATM products adopts a generic differentiation strategy in terms of technology and point of locations. The place is definitely a competitive advantage of bank ATMs and being an early mover, they could capture a large share of customers in the urban areas.
As the ATM cards are specially made for the particular banks, they are definitely a tool for gaining advantage over the competitors. Hence the bank enjoys a definitive leadership in terms of its competitive advantage as an early mover where it could capture a large urban area, and in terms of technology where one bank’s ATM card doesn’t fit into another.
In the case of second firm, which has a 60 percent share of T3MP, faces the threat from substitute products. But T3MP has got the competitive advantage over its substitute product, due to the low bargaining power of customers. T3MP seems to have only a major substitute, whose market share seemed to have dented by the increase in price of the substitute. The low price of T3MP compared to the substitute is definitely a competitive advantage for the firm. This would decrease the competition from the substitute product which in turn will increase the sale of T3MP. Further, the substitute won’t be able to limit the growth of T3MP by setting a sealing price. The firm could increase its marginal returns through increased sale of T3MP. Thus the firm could capture the market share of the substitute which is twice as that of T3MP and could increase its revenue and earning potential.
Answer:
The right choice is "3 Correctly ignored a sunk cost"
Explanation:
As the ticket to the opera was already bought and it is nonrefundable, nonexchangeable, and nontransferable; whether Van decides to go to the opera or to go to the party with Amy; he has incurred $100 cost of ticket which can not be recovered in any manner.
The ticket cost in this question is categorized as sunk cost - cost that incurred in the past and will be remained the same regardless of any future actions. Thus, this type of cost should be ignored when making decision for the future.
So, "3 Correctly ignored a sunk cost" is the correct choice.
Answer:
e. price elasticities of demand for apples and oranges are the same over these price ranges
Explanation:
Price elasticity of demand measures the responsiveness of quantity demanded to changes in price.
Price elasticity = percentage change in quantity demanded / percentage change in price
Percentage change in price = (50-40) / 50 = 0.2 × 100 = 20%
Percentage change in quantity demanded of Apples = (120 - 100) / 100 = 0.2 × 100 =
20%
Percentage change in quantity demanded of oranges = (240 - 200) / 200 = 0.2 × 100 = 20%
Price elasticity of demand for oranges = 20% / 20% = 1
Price elasticity of demand for Apples = 20% / 20% = 1
When coefficient of elasticity is equal than one, elasticity of demand is unit elastic.
This implies that the elasticity of demand for Apples and oranges are the same. A change in the price of oranges and apples would lead to the same proportional change for each of the demand for Apples and oranges.
I hope my answer helps you
Answer:
Controllable margin =$125,000
Return on investment = 20%
Explanation:
<em>Controllable margin is the difference between the sales revenue and the controllable cost. Controllable costs include variable and fixed cost directly under the control of the manager and which are influenced by his decisions.</em>
Controllable margin - Sales revenue - variable cost - controllable fixed cost
Controllable margin= $500,000 - $300,000 - 75,000 = $125,000
Controllable margin =$125,000
Return on investment = (controllable margin/ Average investment) × 100
= (125,000/625,000) × 100 = 20%
Return on investment = 20%