The Transcendentalists were radical thinkers. At the time of their meetings, New England was still holding on to a remnant of Puritanical values. There was a sense that organized religion had authority over one's personal life and individual choices. For the Transcendentalists, this was a big no-no! They were quite critical of conformity, or forcing one's behavior to match social expectations or standards. They were nonconformists - people who do not conform to a generally accepted pattern of thought or action. They rejected common ideas and practices, particularly organized religion. There wasn't a Transcendentalist church or a holy book of Transcendentalism. Instead, there were regular meetings for lively conversation and a shared hope of cultivating a modern, fluid, and personal sense of spirituality.
The main argument of the passage contending for the rights of women is have equality in education.
Contending for the rights of woman, my argument is mainly built on this simple principle, that if she is not prepared by education to become the companion of man, she may stop the progress of knowledge and virtue; for truth must be common to all, or it will be inefficacious with respect to its influence on general and this will indicate the discrimination of women.
Hence, women should get equality in right to education and must be treated in equality with the men.
Learn more about the contending rights of the women from the link given below.
brainly.com/question/14226883
#SPJ4
Answer:
C. Sarcasm
Explanation:
Sarcasm is the use of words usually used to either mock or annoy someone, or for humorous purposes. Sarcasm may employ ambivalence, although it is not necessarily ironic. Most noticeable in spoken word, sarcasm is mainly distinguished by the inflection with which it is spoken and is largely context-dependent.
If you are talking about face shields its an alternative to masks. That way you can clearly see their face and mouth for listening purposes.
I believe it's false but I'm not 100% sure.
