Its called desecration of the flag but while there have been many cases to protect the flag from damage they have all been struck down so it is legal to burn the flag
Answer:
Informed consent and anonymity
Explanation:
This researcher has violated the anonymous and informed consent clause. Informed consent has to do with participants knowing the reasons for the informations they provide before they give it out. This researcher was not honest with the students because what he told them he needed the emails for was different from what he ended up using them for. He breached the anonymous clause and the privacy of the students by doing this.
Answer:
d. individuals can easily detect changes in the environment when they are absorbed in a task.
Explanation:
edge2020
The correct answer is no.
Alisha was under no obligation to help Timmy, <em>there is no such thing like</em> <em>duty to rescue.</em> There is no legal requirement in the United States to help and rescue someone who is in danger. Even in extreme situation, when a person sees a person falling into a river for example, the witness of the situation is no obliged to assist with help.
There are some cases with some important exceptions: if the defendant created the peril he is obliged to come to the plaintiff's aid, if the defendant started to rescue the plaintiff, he must continue to do so, if the defendant is in a special relationship with the plaintiff ( teacher-student, worker-employer), he is under duty to rescue him.
Alisha was under no duty to inform Timmy's parents of the danger facing him <em>but she should have done it nevertheless.</em> She should at least have phoned them if she didn't have the time to stop by. She knew the boy well and she should have cared more. The need to help the boy should have come from her moral guidance and not as a sense of duty to be performed.
