Answer:
1) a) accepting the new drug is better based on its effectiveness when in reality the drug ain't better than the drug in current use because of its side effects
b) Accepting and using the current drug in use when it is not as effective as the new drug
c) Type 1 error
2) a) rejecting the vitamin supplement based on not knowing the harmful side effects
b) Accepting the Vitamin supplement based on just health benefits it portrays without comparison with other supplement.
c) Type II error
3) Increase the significance level ( A )
Step-by-step explanation:
1)
a) To make a type 1 error in this situation is accepting the new drug is better and prescribing it to the millions of people based only on its effectiveness when in reality the drug ain't better than the drug in current use because of its side effects
b) A type II error in context is :Accepting and using the current drug in use when it is not as effective as the new drug
c) Type I error
2)
a) Type 1 error is rejecting the vitamin supplement based on not knowing the harmful side effects
b) Accepting the Vitamin supplement based on just health benefits it portrays without comparison with other supplement.
c) Type II error
3) If committing a type 1 error is much worse
Increase the significance level
Answer:
3(4n) + 2 + 6n
12n + 2 + 6n
12n + 6n + 2
18n + 2 is not equal to 13n + 2
hence both the expression are not equivalent
Let's find the rates at which Melinda and Marcus are saving money and compare them.
Based on the table, we can see that Melinda originally had $75. Then she got $135 in 5 weeks. So the rate of saving money is (135–75)/5 = $12 per week.
This rate is unchanged for the next weeks. As we can see, she got $195 in the next 5 weeks. So she saved $60 more those 5 weeks, or the rate is $60/5 = $12 per week again.
So Melinda saved $12 per week.
As for Marcus, the equation tells us that the rate of saving money is $14 which is the coefficient in front of x.
Hence, t<span>he rate at which Melinda is adding to her savings each week is 2$
less than the rate at which Marcus is adding to his savings each week.</span>
Answer:
54$
Step-by-step explanation:
If 6% per year for 3 years, we can do 6 x 3 = 18 to find the total interest percent over all the years. Then we can do 18% of 300 = 54 Therefore, you will gain 54$ of simple in three years.
P.S. Dont fall for those link scams! ;)
Hope this helped! If it did, please give me brainliest! It would help a lot! Thanks! :D
