1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Stella [2.4K]
2 years ago
14

Explain to me why school is bad in a complete paragraph with no less than 150 words.

Social Studies
2 answers:
LuckyWell [14K]2 years ago
7 0

Answer:

School is the place where we learn to read and write. It is the most crucial place for a student, and it helps us to learn new things. The teachers are always helpful and teach us important things in life. We must always be regular at school as missing classes can lead to problems during exams. Schools teach us how to be consistent, punctual, and obedient. It also makes us better human beings so that we can treat our elders with respect. Most of what we learn is a result of the learning imparted by our teachers.

It is said that schools shape us to become more responsible adults. We must treat our schools with respect as they are the places of worship for a student. A good student is the product of a good school. My school has excellent teachers who help students with studies, sports, and other extracurricular activities. They are the building blocks of aa school and teach us important lessons that we must apply in our daily lives.

Schools teach us to cooperate with our friends and classmates. The basic value of sharing is taught right from the beginning. We have different classrooms where the teachers teach us different subjects. Equal weightage is given to both studies and co-curricular activities so that we develop into better individuals. Our schools will always try to focus on our overall growth and transform us into healthy adults.

Brilliant_brown [7]2 years ago
6 0

The top two mental health issues are anxiety and depression, with over 4 in 10 students who seek help reporting the conditions.

Those of us working with students is unsurprised by these numbers. I first wrote about my experiences with student anxiety before I even had this space and since then, I’ve come to believe that we are in the midst of an anxiety “crisis” when it comes to students and school.

The obvious response to increased demand from students for mental health services is to ramp up the amount and availability of those services – and we should no doubt do this – but maybe at the same time we should ask a different question, “Why does exposure to school cause so much anxiety and depression?”

I have my personal theories, most significantly that students experience school not as a place to explore and fulfill their potentials, but a gauntlet to be run, where failure is severely punished, their futures of security and prosperity permanently foreclosed following even a slight bobble.

I work with many students who spend an inordinate amount of time fearing for their futures, despite the fact that many of them come from backgrounds of socioeconomic and demographic privilege.

Add in a climate of economic anxiety, the increasing costs of education (often in the form of loans that loom on the horizon), and a culture that encourages the pursuit of “practical” studies that may be ill-suited to the spirit and desires of students, and you have an atmosphere that seems conducive to stress, depression, and anxiety. Writing at Pacific Standard, Madeline Thomas asks, “Did we fail our kids by relying on prescription medication to treat ADHD?”

Thomas covers the struggles of a generation who has come of age taking prescription drugs like Ritalin and Adderall which were once, “considered a godsend when they first started being used to help hyperactive, unfocused kids succeed in school.”

Now, Thomas finds adults who feel incapable of doing tasks as seemingly simple as grocery shopping without the aid of ADHD medication. They view themselves as addicts, terrified to navigate their professional lives without chemical aids.

They have experienced years of messed up sleep, reduced appetites, feelings that they’re never quite themselves.

literally damaging to students’ mental health. The very nature of what we ask them to do and how we ask them to do it seems to be harmful, and yet our response to this damage is to provide more resources to buff them up and get them back in the game.

For students diagnosed with ADHD, I believe we have pathologized differences. As schooling increasingly focused on paying “attention” and exhibiting compliance, those wired differently had to be “rewired,” lest they “fall behind” their peers.

These two stories and Secretary Clinton’s statement on tests share something in common, namely that school is a system where the student is fodder to feed the machine, rather than the product itself.

Rather than asking “What is good for students?” – “good” in every sense of the word -  we instead orient policy and actions around abstractions like “success,” or “college readiness” without examining the underlying costs of pursuing those abstractions.

And so we get a culture where seven-year-olds who don’t get recess or art class and have difficulty paying attention for 45 minutes at a time become a problem in need of pharmaceutical intervention.

We get a culture where students see school not as a place to practice curiosity and grow socially, intellectually, and even spiritually, but a contest where the stakes are their future economic security and anxiety and depression are constant threats.

We get a culture where tests are not chances for students to test themselves and experience the fruits of their work and study, and are instead merely a chance to be judged by authorities who run the system.

These policies and perspectives are the result of prioritizing systems over people, of requiring conformity, and of valuing standardization over freedom and individuality.

They are anti-human, and it is not a mystery as to why they’re failing.

I am not arguing that we should make school easier, that we need to ease up on the kids. My experience is that students enjoy challenges that are authentic and meaningful. They want to be given the chance to figure out who they are and what they can do. They crave it.

But that’s not what we’re doing. Succeeding in school, as schooling is currently designed, seems to actively work against students developing the habits, knowledge, and self-concept that will allow them to thrive as real-world adults.

How can we believe we’re on the right track as students emerge depressed, anxious, medicated, and incapable of working without the oversight and approval of the authority figures?

You might be interested in
A common form of denial
andriy [413]
Stubbornness or ignorance
8 0
3 years ago
There are various options for selecting a target value for objective indicators. For programs that are innovative, address rare
expeople1 [14]

Answer:

Set target for a statistically significant improvement compared to the current value.

Explanation:

For programs that are innovative, address rare health problems, or are highly tailored to the location a target of value of a statistically significant improvement compared to the current value is set. It is appropriate when there is credible data source and policy makers need to be convinced on an investment that is worthwhile. Also, change can happen anytime and planners must be able to set an argument that greater change will most likely occur by chance alone. The Z-test is used to determine the amount of change that is statistically significant. Very often, the significance level is set at p= 0.05 which implies that the probability of reaching the target by chance alone is 5% or less than 5 in 100 which translates to a Z-score of 1.96 which is used to estimate the target value.

3 0
3 years ago
?kayla is seeing a new client who has an extremely different set of beliefs than her own. when working with this client, kayla f
OLga [1]
Kayla is lacking congruence, which is what most therapists normally have with their patients.
4 0
4 years ago
Look at the map of European alliances in 1914.
agasfer [191]
<span>D is the correct answer. The Triple Alliance consisted of Germany, Italy and Austria-Hungary. Due to the geographical positions of these countries, Germany and Italy both shared a land border with France on the West side and Germany and Austria-Hungary both shared a land border with Russia on the East side. Russia and France were both part of the Triple Entente, who were against the Triple Alliance. The data on the construction of battleships and deadnoughts suggests Great Britain and Germany were in an arms race.</span>
3 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Juan is a new employee at the car dealership. He hasn't been around long enough to receive instructions from his supervisors or
bixtya [17]

Answer:

Role ambiguity

Explanation:

He is unsure of how the business work in the car dealer since he is new for that reason, he does not know what to do.

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What is meant by popular sovereignty and why was it important?
    5·1 answer
  • How many provinces does canada have??
    8·2 answers
  • ​The sociological term for the process by which people act toward and respond to other people, and which is considered the found
    7·1 answer
  • This true Lennon and McCartney collaboration from Sgt. Pepper showed their different points of view in the lyrics. It is... "Fix
    5·1 answer
  • Which of these policies is considered to be a comprehensive health policy?
    7·1 answer
  • What is the form of government described in the scenario below?*
    10·2 answers
  • By 2050 the Census Bureau projects
    5·1 answer
  • What should be done to establish sustainable peace in the society in four point<br>​
    5·1 answer
  • Qué áreas son particularmente relevantes para reducir el problema del plástico?
    13·1 answer
  • Sara recently graduated with a degree in marketing. She started a job that pays her $48,000 per year. Her monthly net income is
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!