This statement is false.
If he were to double the amount that Emily has to get franks, franks would have more.
Look :)
Emily's = 300
Frank's = 300 x 2 = 600
now...
Emily's = 300
Frank's = 600
So frank has more! NOT fewer.
Consider the equation

1) First row of the table
Set x=0 and solve as follows:

The answer is y=20 and the pair x-y is (0,20)
2) Second row
Set x=1 and solve, as follows:

The answers are y=10 and (1,10)
3) Third row.
Set y=0 and solve as follows:

The answers are x=2 and (2,0)
Answer:
I believe this is neither a direct or inverse relationship.
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
Sampling bias
Step-by-step explanation:
Bias refers a prominent problem in statistical analysis whereby one or more analytical factor are favored than the other during an analysis which should be made random. The problem. With Graham's dissertation study is the fact that he failed to randomlyvplace his subjects or observation in the study groups, favoring a particular group with non random subset. When randomization is ejected or missing from an analysis or study, it becomes less and less representative. Here, allotting early Arrivals Into the treatment group has introduced a sampling bias as those who came later, this will also leads to less reproducibility of experiment.