Your current exam mean is 95. if you receive a 95 on the next exam, your mean cannot be determined.
<h3>What is meant by the mean?</h3>
This is the term that is used to refer to the average set of values in a given dataset. The mean is the average that is calculated in the data set. The mean can be gotten when you add all of the values and then divide it through by the total number of values in the data set.
Hence we cans say that your current exam mean is 95. if you receive a 95 on the next exam, your mean cannot be determined.
Read more about mean here: brainly.com/question/1136789
#SPJ1
compete question
If your current exam mean is 95, and you receive a 95 on the next exam, how is your mean affected?
A It is decreased.
B It is unchanged.
C It is increased.
D It cannot be determined.
The bays are excellent for shipping, shipbuilding, and fishing
Answer:
A & B
Explanation:
They used their new food to increase their population and then spread their knowledge to all of Africa. More food meant bigger populations, which led to cities.
Answer:
A. two; majority of popular vote
Explanation:
This is true in the sense that, Governorship position term limit in the United States is four years per term and can only serve for two terms, making it eight years. This is in some cases within a certain years period of 12 or 16 years.
Also, the governorship election in the United States is a direct election, which means it is based on popular votes.
Answer:
For Congressional redistricting in 2003.
Explanation:
<em>What are special sessions?</em>
Special session amounts to legislative overtime. If there is a stalemate on some of the key issues in the government, a governor can decide to call for a special session. During special sessions, bills that are discussed should be on governor's agenda. Legislators have a period of 30 days to do their work, and it can be called for at any time.
<em>Texas Redistricting</em>
2003 Texas redistricting is a contraversional state plan for defining new Congresional districts. In 2002 Republicans won the control of the Texas state legislature for the first time in 130 years. Their plan was to work on establishing a majority in the House of Representatives seats from Texas, which was held by their own party. It is said that this redistricting violated the Voting Rights Act and was settled by the Supreme Court of the United States of America in a case called <em>League of United Latin American Citizens v. Perry</em> in 2006. The Court ruled that only one District violated the aforementioned act.
