I believe the answer is the feminist perspective.
The feminist perspective perceive gender as the role that a society expected to be done by a certain biological sex.
In order to tackle this problem, they aimed to prove that the female are just as capable as man in many roles that the society does not expect them to be.
The professor's suggestion best illustrates an<u> "evolutionary" </u>perspective.
To utilize an evolutionary perspective is to think about all practices, (for example, fears, biases, connections, and so on.) as the aftereffect of transformative procedures. This point of view takes the position that practices appeared because of adjustments to living conditions.
Evolutionary perspectives on human conduct are nearly as old as the study of brain research itself. developmental brain science is centered around how advancement has molded the psyche and conduct.
According to brutus, A confederation of small republics is more likely to preserve and protect personal liberties, because as the people are the sovereign, and their sentiments are communicated by themselves which is why it must be limited so that the people can conveniently assemble and debate.
- The large republics could cancel out the voices of the people and states and the authority of the states, because they are bigger in size and could gain more power and could infringe on state sovereignty, which would infringe on the peoples' liberties
Brutus favors a true confederation, which would be: a number of independent states entering , for conducting certain general concerns, in which they have a common interest, leaving the management of their internal and local affairs to go and their separate governments.
to know more about republic click here
brainly.com/question/15340060
#SPJ4
