Answer:
.
Step-by-step explanation:
An exponential function is typically in the form
, where
and
(
) are constants to be found.
In this question:
means that
.
means that
.
Divide one of the two equations by the other to eliminate
and solve for
.
The number of the right-hand side of the second equation is larger than that of the first equation. Hence, divide the second equation with the first:
.
.
.
.
Substitute
back into either equation (for example, the first equation) and solve for
:
.
.
Substitute
and
into the other equation. That equation should also be satisfied.
Therefore, this function would be:
.
Using the unit circle, you can visualise the secant as follows:
- Draw the vertical line passing trough (1,0)
- Extend the radius until it meets this line at point P
- The length of OP is the secant of your angle.
Since -90 means that the radius points downwards, it means that the radius is vertical as well, and thus it never meets the vertical line through (1,0).
Thus, the secant is not defined at -90.
In fact, if we switch back to the function notation, we can confirm this claim, since we have

which is undefined.
Maybe try add it then takeaway most of it
Answer:
The two angles mentioned are alternate interior angles, so they are congruent.
303 feet.
Step-by-step explanation:
If you draw off the flag you can see they are alternate interior and are congruent.
Also again, make a diagram it really helps a lot
:)