Answer: Mitigation of damages
Explanation: The concept of Mitigation of damages defines the action an individual or party who has suffered or incurred a loss arising from a breach of contract should take in other to lessen or mitigate the effect of the contract breach. This will lessen or reduce the loss incurred as a result of the breach caused by the other party. Once there is a breach of contract, Mitigation of damages becomes a duty on the party who has suffered a loss and should therefore, prevent increased 'avoidable loss' caused by the contract breach. Further losses incurred has a result of failure to mitigate damages won't be catered for by the party guilty of the breach of contract.
Answer:
A dramatic speech about what Liberty, Equality, and Fraternity is explained below in complete details.
Explanation:
The purpose of the slogan "Liberty, Fraternity, Equality" has also provided an attraction as natural regulation to the First Article of the Universal announcement of Human Rights: All humans are displayed independent and equal in honor and fairness. the slogan "Liberty, Equality, Fraternity" was described as a "source" of the Republic.
<u>Flesch-Kincaid</u> readability formulas can help indicate how difficult a text may be for a reader.
A quality of your writing that makes it easy to read is readability. It informs you of the writing's lucidity. Learn how it functions and how to utilize it. What amount of education someone will require to be able to read a piece of text comfortably can be determined by the readability score.
A text's readability is a gauge of how simple it is to read. How legible your writing is will depend on the difficulty level, familiarity, legibility, and typography. User experience is greatly influenced by readability. Trust with your audience is increased via easily accessible content.
To know more about readability
brainly.com/question/8924546
#SPJ4
Answer:
The correct answer is a. Humphreys used license plate numbers to target their homes and interview the men without disclosing the real subject of his study.
Explanation:
Laud Humphreys (1930-1988) was a sociologist who for his PhD dissertation wrote a study called <em>Tearoom Trade</em> (1968), where he studied the behavior of males who engaged in homosexual sex in public toilets. Humphreys made a series of discoveries, like finding out that most of the men who engaged in these practices were not openly or overtly homosexual, and even a majority of them (54%) were married. However, his research was widely criticized because of how he performed it. Humphreys acted out as a sort of look-out for the men in the toilets, but without disclosing his identity as a researcher. Moreover, <u>Humphreys followed the unwitting subjects of his study to their homes by </u><u>tracking their license plate numbers and interviewed them</u><u>, posing as a government health officer and hiding his true identity as a sociologist conducting research</u>. Lying to subjects and hiding from them that they're part of a study is frowned upon by the scientific community, so the research was widely controversial, and it's still brought up as an example of the ethics of social research.
