1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Sauron [17]
3 years ago
10

Why are moral standards generally higher than standards set by criminal statutes?

Law
1 answer:
Andru [333]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

The standards set by moral laws are generally higher than those set by criminal laws.

Explanation:

You might be interested in
'Victimhood is not an objective assessment of harm
IrinaK [193]

Answer:

This concept is used by European countries.

Explanation:

The concept of Victimhood adopted by the European countries especially United States of America to invade Afghanistan and control the Asian region. The 9/11 incident is caused by the America itself to get a sympathy vote and a reason just like the incident of pearl harbor to invade Afghanistan to control the region. The main aim of these European countries to control the spreading of communism and not to control the terrorist so this Victimhood helps many countries to get their goals.

7 0
3 years ago
Red is a union official. He is faced with a problem when a union member breaks a union bylaw. To address the union member’s faul
borishaifa [10]

Answer:

red is a union official

Explanation:

that one is true

6 0
3 years ago
Do you think any of the public order crimes should be legalized? which ones? and why?​
Vesna [10]

Answer:It depends on your worldview.

However,in my opinion victimless “crime” such a drug(marijuana) use should be fully legalized like in Netherlands. Because this way it is more safe and they pay taxes to the government

4 0
2 years ago
Jesse james, a 20-year old, was arrested for killing a police officer. As a newly elected prosecutor, you are responsible for pr
Nana76 [90]

It is important to note that various states use various metrics. In general, states adhere to some form of the federal procedural norms. States do have the freedom to take risks in the sake of justice.

<h3>What are federal procedural norms?</h3>

Civil process in United States district courts is governed by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

The Rules Enabling Act requires the United States Supreme Court to promulgate the FRCP, after which the United States Congress has seven months to veto the rules or they become part of the FRCP.

<h3>Further overview on the above legal situation is as follows:</h3>

At the first stage of the "trial," the defendant must submit a plea. This is frequently followed by a first appearance or preliminary hearing, which may involve a plea if evidence is discovered.

If there are compelling reasons to proceed, a grand jury will be formed to conduct more investigations.

A grand jury must provide evidence that justifies a capital murder trial. The district attorney's office has the same authority. The defendant is then asked if he understands the charge at a pre-trial arraignment.

A plea can also be entered here at times. If the evidence merits it, a formal writ will be sent to the court, signaling the start of a trial.

Following that, pre-trial hearings are held, and witnesses may be questioned. If the defendant claims to have an alibi, he must normally produce documentation. He must describe in full where and when he was when he was exonerated from the crime.

A mental examination may be conducted in some circumstances, particularly in capital trials. There may be a demand that multiple-count trials be heard separately in order to avoid biasing the jury (guilty of the first, more likely that he is guilty of the second).

Deposits can then be made. These are largely out-of-court testimony from witnesses that will serve as the foundation for the defense or prosecution when the trial begins.

Depending on the stage, either of these processes can be considered part of the discovery process. The defendant's record is disclosed at this point, and specific objects of evidence are given over for the defendant's comprehension.

The "Pre-Trial Conference," a relatively new federal rule, is convened to agree on specific criteria throughout the trial. The goal is to speed up the trial and streamline the procedure in general.

The defendant might then request that the case be transferred to another jurisdiction.

Learn more about justice:
brainly.com/question/22967374
#SPJ4

7 0
2 years ago
Which title best completes the organizational chart of Maryland government? Voters of Maryland Legislative branch Executive bran
Gennadij [26K]

Answer:

8 points got easily the answer is C

3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • When dealing with Drug Evidence, which response below is not an appropriate precaution?
    14·1 answer
  • Creating and distributing ________ is one of the most widespread types of cybercrimes.
    8·2 answers
  • Would you be willing to be a whistle blower? On what type of issue would you blow the whistle? Inflated overtime submitted on a
    10·1 answer
  • Match the items in the left column to the items in the right column.
    8·1 answer
  • Hi everyone
    7·1 answer
  • Brown just vented what do I do?
    9·1 answer
  • Which of the following is a LEFT leaning or a LEFT wing source.
    8·1 answer
  • Help me answer all of these i’ll give brainlist !
    12·1 answer
  • 2. What is national consensus?
    15·1 answer
  • The shift in Canada WW1 and after that year, PLEASE HELP VERY EASY WRITE A PARAGRAPH
    7·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!