Answer:
NPV is positive,the project should be accepted
Explanation:
In determining whether or not the project should be accepted ,we need to ascertain the Net Present value of the project which is present value of cash inflows of $13,000 for 35 years minus the initial investment of $125,374.60 committed today.
The annuity factor for 8% for 35 year horizon is 11.6546 using annuity table.
Present of cash inflow=cash inflow*annuity factor=$13,000*11.6546=$151,509.80
Net present value=$ 151,509.80-$125,374.60=$ 26,135.20
The investment has a positive NPV,hence should be accepted
Exporting products overseas is an example of a convertible trade fair trade. Thus, the correct option is A). a convertible trade fair trade.
<h3>What does the term export mean?</h3>
Export refers to the production of goods and services in one country but sold to a buyer abroad or in another country. It is the oldest forms of economic transfer of goods and services between different countries.
Export is the economic activity of exporting or selling the goods to the another country or across the border of a country.
Basically, exports lead to increased investment, technological advancement and market expansion which contribute to the economic growth.
Learn more about exports here:-
brainly.com/question/14099857
#SPJ1
The best ground on which the defendant ( Company S ) can dismiss the suit filed by the plaintiff (Company T) is the standing to sue.
<h3>What is standing to sue?</h3>
Standing to sue refers to a situation where the plaintiff who has filed the case must prove with appropriate proof of having damages or injuries in respect of the conduct of the defendant.
In the provided case, Company T has to prove that the products of Company S are actually defective through appropriate evidence. If Company T can't able to prove their alleged claim before the court, then the case is decided in the favor of the defendant party, that is, Company S.
Therefore, the standing to sue can be used as a ground by Company S for dismissing the claim of Company T.
Learn more about the standing to sue in the related link:
brainly.com/question/14820416
#SPJ4
Answer:
The answer is A.
Explanation:
According to the details given in the question on the two financial advisor's approach, the first advisor does not request a payment but a commission on the funds purchased with the inheritance money. The second advisor does request payment for the job and also a share on the assets managed with the inheritance money.
If Kirby wants to minimize the upfront expenses which can be described as the sum that is paid before a service or a job is done, then the first advisor is the better option. So the answer is A.
I hope this answer helps.
Answer:
A. USD 5,180/-
Explanation:
In the actual method of inventory valuation, the inventory reaming and the COGS (Cost Of Goods Sold) is measured after each purchase or sale of a transaction. So the COGS and the remaining value of the inventory is known all the time.
Formula:
- Gross margin is equal to Sales minus COGS
