The answer to this question is the "Assimilation". This is a process by which the members of the group of subordinate racial and the ethnic groups become absorbed into the dominant culture. It is also referring to the processes of embracing in or taking a full understanding of the information or the ideas.
The world would be a better place if people were more educated about equality and diversity because both genders male and female would know their rights ,treat them respectfully,and not take advantage of the rights and out use them when it comes equality and the both genders would not judge each other.As well as to diversity the world would be an better place because all race and ethnic backgrounds it would less racism and people would work together with the different backgrounds despite their gender,ethnicity,race,and sexual orientation.
Once I asked, “Who was Adam Smith's best friend? ... When David Ricardo or John Stuart Mill or Robert Torrens adopted a theory of ... In his ordinary state of health, strength and spirits; in the ordinary ...
..........<span>A </span>trade route<span> is a logistical network identified as a series of pathways and stoppages used for ... In modern times, commercial activity shifted from the </span>major trade routes<span> of .... Part of this road through </span>Pakistan<span> also coincided with the Silk Road...........
</span>
Answer: C In a 100-meter race, two of Amy's co-participants won Silver and Bronze and she performed exceedingly well; it follows that Amy won Gold.
Explanation:
There is a flaw in the evidence presented by the lawyer, several flaws actually:
- The client could have been the culprit and left the main door and garage open as an alibi.
- There is no mention of there being an altercation with a thief that cost the wife her life.
- There is no mention of things being stolen to prove that it was a thief.
The attorney used one logic and deduced a flawed conclusion from it so the option that is similar has to do the same as the above.
Option A is not applicable here as blame was taken by the perpetrator.
Option B is not flawed as one would be expected to be late in such circumstances.
Option C has a flaw because performing exceedingly well is relative. Amy could simply be performing exceedingly well in relation to past races. Amy's co-participants could have performed even better which is why they won medals and while Amy performed exceedingly well by her standards, it was not enough to win a medal.
Option D has no flaw. It is a logical deduction and argument just like option E.
