Why are lines AC and RS skew lines?

Mathematics

2 answers:

makvit [3.9K]2 years ago

6 0

Answer:They lie in different planes and will never intersect.

Step-by-step explanation:They lie in different planes and will never intersect.

patriot [66]2 years ago

3 0

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

They lie in different planes but will intersect if a plane is drawn to contain both lines

You might be interested in

which is not a result of multiplying the height of a rectangular prism by a scale factor of 1/2 and I need work to

chubhunter [2.5K]

C is the answer

for example

assume that the height of a rectangular prism is 2, width is 1 and length measures 3

the volume will be 6
(2*1*3)

if we multiply height with the scale factor of 1/2
it becomes 1

so the volume will be 3
(1*1*3)

this situation goes for other examples, too

good luck

5 0

3 years ago

According to a certain central bank from 2000 to 2016 the average price of a new home in a certain region increased by %87 to

ch4aika [34]

X*1.87= 572
X=572/1.87
X=$306

6 0

3 years ago

If x ≠ 0 then what is x^0?

grigory [225]

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

Remember that anything to the 0th power is going to be 1 in terms of exponent rules!

6 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

A new mixture of self-tanning & moisturizing lotions for everyday use is being developed. This mixture is made by mixing 70

777dan777 [17]

Answer:

450 ounces

Step-by-step explanation:

We know that the cost of the mixture $C_m$ must be the cost of the everyday moisturizing lotion $C_e$ plus the cost of the self-tanning lotion $C_s$ , which means $C_m=C_e+C_s$ .

The cost of any substance will be the cost per ounce of the substance (c), multiplied by the number of ounces (n), which means C=nc, so we have from the previous formula that we have:

$n_m c_m=n_e c_e + n_s c_s$

But we also know that the number of ounces of the mixture must be the sum of the number of ounces of the everyday moisturizing lotion with the number of ounces of the self-tanning lotion, so we have

$n_e c_e + n_s c_s=n_m c_m=(n_e+n_s) c_m=n_e c_m+n_s c_m$