Answer:
ehem... where is tha image??
Explanation:
Answer:
The correct way to answer the question: According to the theory of new classical economics, if business sentiment and investment spending decreases, the aggregate demand curve: shifts to the left and the price level falls, while aggregate output: decreases.
Explanation:
The balance of an economy, anywhere in the world, is pretty complex thing. In order to understand both the short-term, and long-term ways in which the economy of a country may respond to different factors, but most especially to GDP, which is the measure of how much, and how well, a country is producing and supplying a demand for certain goods and services, it is necessary to understand both a theory known as the short-term Keynesian analysis and also the neoclassical theory of economics, which applies to long-term macroeconomics. In the case shown above, the point of start is the potential GDP, which will mark the real GDP of a country. The second point is the aggregate supply and demand markers that indicate how an economy is doing with respect to potential GDP. If investement is not placed into an economy, and business sentiment decreasese, it means that productivity will drop, and the aggregate demand curve turns to the left as many other factors are also driven down. Since aggregate output means the amount that is produced in goods and services, the lesser the business interest and spending, the lesser production there will be.
Answer:
The correct answer to the following question will be Option D (Fundamental attribution error).
Explanation:
A common method of prejudice throughout cognitive psychology seems to be the fundamental attribution mistake or error.
- Fundamentally, it includes putting a greater emphasis on administrative traits of appearance to clarify the actions, someone, in a particular circumstance, instead of always worrying about actual physical subjective.
- Humans appear to over-emphasize qualitative even persona-based interpretations of actions found in others often under-emphasizing situational interpretations.
Therefore, the given statement illustrates the above error.
Indirect democracy is the correct answer.
<h2>
To appeal to the dissatisfied, multi-ethnic population of the Soviet Union.</h2>
A comment from the <em>History Channel</em> explains the situation in the USSR when Gorbachev was in power. "In 1985, even many of the most conservative hardliners realized that much needed to change. The Soviet economy was faltering and dissidents and internal and external critics were calling for an end to political repression and government secrecy." As far as the aim of Gorbachev's reforms, "The plan was for the Soviet Union to become more transparent, and in turn for the leadership of the nation and the Communist Party to be improved," according to <em>YourDictionary</em>.
In March 1985, Mikhail Gorbachev proposed policies of <em>perestroika </em>(restructuring) and <em>glasnost</em> (openness) in the Soviet Union. These seemed like policies that leaned in the direction of Western ways of economics and politics. <em>Perestroika </em>meant allowing some measure of private enterprise in the Soviet Union. <em>Glasnost </em>meant allowing a bit of freedom in regard to speech and publication. Gorbachev was not trying to get rid of the Soviet communist system. He actually was trying to prop it up and preserve it, because it was starting to have many problems sustaining itself, and there was too much dissatisfaction and dissent occurring among the country's people. But in the end, opening things up a bit with <em>perestroika </em>and <em>glasnost</em> policies pushed the USSR further in the direction of shedding the communist model under which it had lived for so long, and would begin to spell the end of the USSR.
