The true statement is Peter walks at a rate of 13 over 4 miles per hour.
<h3>What is the true statement?
</h3>
Direct variation is when two variables move in the same direction. If one variable increases, the other variable increases. When the hour Peter walks increases, the distance he walks also increases.
Here are the options:
Peter walks at a rate of StartFraction 4 over 13 EndFraction miles per hour.
Peter walks at a rate of 4 miles per hour.
Peter walks at a rate of StartFraction 13 over 4 EndFraction miles per hour.
Peter walks at a rate of 13 miles per hour.
To learn more about direct variation, please check: brainly.com/question/27573249
#SPJ1
Answer:
-14n - 2r - 21
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
1) Fail to reject the Null hypothesis
2) We do not have sufficient evidence to support the claim that the mean distance students traveled to school from their current residence was different for males and females.
Step-by-step explanation:
A university administrator wants to test if there is a difference between the distance men and women travel to class from their current residence. So, the hypothesis would be:

The results of his tests are:
t-value = -1.05
p-value = 0.305
Degrees of freedom = df = 21
Based on this data we need to draw a conclusion about test. The significance level is not given, but the normally used levels of significance are 0.001, 0.005, 0.01 and 0.05
The rule of the thumb is:
- If p-value is equal to or less than the significance level, then we reject the null hypothesis
- If p-value is greater than the significance level, we fail to reject the null hypothesis.
No matter which significance level is used from the above mentioned significance levels, p-value will always be larger than it. Therefore, we fail to reject the null hypothesis.
Conclusion:
We do not have sufficient evidence to support the claim that the mean distance students traveled to school from their current residence was different for males and females.