Answer:
Option (d) $16,008.17
Explanation:
Data provided in the question:
The price of the Firebird in 1969 = $2,500
Price index in 1969 = 36.7
Price index in 2013 = 235
Now,
The price of the Firebird in 2013 dollars will be
= [ Price index in 2013 ÷ Price index in 1969 ] × The price of the Firebird in 1969
= [ 235 ÷ 36.7 ] × $2,500
= 6.40327 × $2,500
= $16,008.17
Hence,
Option (d) $16,008.17
Answer:
Effect of Transaction on Cash Flows
Effects Amount
1. Cash Payment $239,000
2. Cash Receipt $252,000 (12000*$21)
3. Cash Receipt $91,400
4. Cash Payment $491,000
5. Cash Payment $86,000
6. Cash Receipt $188,100 (190,000*0.99)
7. Cash Payment $353,400 (6,200*$57)
8. Cash Payment $36,100 [1.90*(23,000-4,000)]
When a lender checks the credit score of Jason for an auto loan, they would most likely notice that <u>b. He </u><u>paid off </u><u>a</u><u> car loan </u><u>after making</u><u> every payment</u><u> for 4 years. </u>
Lenders checking credit scores:
- Usually pay more attention to related loans
- Only bother with the credit score of the person in question not their relatives
The loan is for a car or an automobile of some sort so the lender will be looking for related loans in Jason's history. They will therefore most likely notice the car loan that was paid off.
In conclusion, a lender for an auto loan will most likely notice an auto loan history.
Options for this question include:
a. His savings account has more than $3000 in it
b. He paid off a car loan after making every payment for 4 years
c. When he stopped paying his credit card for 3 months 9 years ago
d. The credit scores of his family, including his parents and his wife if he is married
<em>Find out more at brainly.com/question/14805575. </em>
<span>The primary purpose of the requirements analysis phase is to determine and document the specific features and functions of the new system. It does not eliminate obviously nonsensible projects before forming a project development team. Identify the requisite skills needed or show personnel assigned to the project or investigates how much similar projects have cost in the past.</span>
Answer:
These are the options for the question:
A. They should be more willing to tear down the $5 million stadium, because it cost less to build.
B. They should be more willing to tear down the $50 million stadium, because it cost more to build.
C. The cost to build the old stadium shouldn’t be considered.
And this is the correct answer:
A. They should be more willing to tear down the $5 million stadium, because it cost less to build.
Explanation:
City A will likely be more willing to tear down its old stadium because it costed $5 million to build. City B, on the other hand, will have to think twice because a stadium that costed $50 billion to build could have more value than it seems, or the City could simply not have enough money to build a better new stadium (something that would probably cost more than $50 billion to do).
