1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
padilas [110]
4 years ago
11

se the following facts to assess the time-based model of security for the ABC Company; how well does the existing system protect

ABC? Assume that the best-, average-, and worst-case estimates are independent for each component of the model.The company is considering investing up to an additional $100,000 to improve its security. Given the following possibilities, which single investment would you recommend? Which combination of investments would you recommend? Explain your answer.A. An investment of $75,000 would change the estimates for protection time to 19 minutes (worst case), 23 minutes (average case), and 30 minutes (best case).B. An investment of $75,000 would change the estimates for detection time to 2 minutes (best case), 4 minutes (average case), and 7 minutes (worst case).C. An investment of $75,000 would change the estimates for response time to 3 minutes (best case), 6 minutes (average case), and 10 minutes (worst case).D. An investment of $25,000 would change the estimates for protection time to 17 minutes (worst case), 22 minutes (average case), and 28 minutes (best case).E. An investment of $25,000 would change the estimates of detection time to 4 minutes (best case), 7 minutes (average case) and 9 minutes (worst case).F. An investment of $25,000 would change the estimates for response time to 4 minutes (best case), 9 minutes (average case), and 12 minutes (worst case).
Business
1 answer:
Sedbober [7]4 years ago
7 0

Answer:

Question Completed:

Use the following facts to assess the time-based model of security for the ABC Company;  how well does the existing system protect ABC? Assume that the best-, average-,  and worst-case estimates are independent for each component of the model.

1) Estimated time that existing controls will protect the system from attack = 15  minutes (worst case), 20 minutes (average case), and 25 minutes (best case)

2) Estimated time to detect that an attack is happening = 5 minutes (best case), 8  minutes (average case) and 10 minutes (worst case)

3) Estimated time to respond (or correct) to an attack once it has been detected = 6 minutes  (best case), 14 minutes (average case), and 20 minutes (worst case)  

Current Estimate

Case                       P             D            R         Time based security(P>D+R)

Best                      25              5           6           25 > 11

Average               20              8           14           20 < 22

Worst                    15              10          20           15 < 30

Assumptions      

A) Case                       P             D            R         Time based security(P>D+R)

     Best                      30            5           6           30 > 11

     Average               23            8           14           23 > 22

     Worst                    19            10          20           19 < 30

B) Case                       P             D            R         Time based security(P>D+R)

     Best                      25            2           6           25 > 8

   Average                 20            4           14           20 > 18

    Worst                      15            7          20           15 < 27

C) Case                       P             D            R         Time based security(P>D+R)

     Best                      25             5           3           25 > 8

    Average                20              8           6           20 > 14

    Worst                    15              10          10           15 < 20

D) Case                       P             D            R         Time based security(P>D+R)

    Best                       28              5           6           28 > 11

    Average                22              8           14           22 = 22

    Worst                     17              10          20           17 < 30

E) Case                       P             D            R         Time based security(P>D+R)

     Best                      25            4           6           25 > 10

   Average                 20            7           14           20 < 21

    Worst                      15            9          20           15 < 29

F) Case                       P             D            R         Time based security(P>D+R)

     Best                      25             5           4           25 > 9

    Average                20              8           9           20 > 17

    Worst                    15              10          12           15 < 22

Explanation:

Question 1) Which single investment would you recommend?

A single investment of $75,000 in option C. This gives a margin of +17 on the best case scenario and +6 on the average case scenario and -5 on the worst case scenario, which is the best alternative on the 3 scenarios as the joint outcome is +18 (17 + 6 - 5).

Question 2) Which combination?

Note that since the total amount is $100,000, the combination would be a $75,000 and a $25,000 investment

The combination of A and F, gives the best outcome on the 3 cases in comparison to other combinations

Case                       P             D            R         Time based security(P>D+R)

 Best                      30             5           4           30 > 9

Average                 23            8           9           23 > 17

Worst                     19              10          12          19 < 22

You might be interested in
21. Mcclam, Inc., is considering the purchase of a machine that would cost $100,000 and would last for 9 years. At the end of 9
Dimas [21]

Answer:

The correct option is A. $3,833

Explanation:

Note: This question is not complete has the options are omitted. The complete question is therefore provided before answering the question as follows:

Mcclam, Inc., is considering the purchase of a machine that would cost $100,000 and would last for 9 years. At the end of 9 years, the machine would have a salvage value of $23,000. The machine would reduce labor and other costs by $19,000 per year. Additional working capital of $2,000 would be needed immediately. All of this working capital would be recovered at the end of the life of the machine. The company requires a minimum pretax return of 13% on all investment projects. The net present value of the proposed project is closest to:

A. $3,833

B. $5,167

C. -$2,492

D. $11,514

The explanation of the answer is now given as follows:

Given:

Machine cost = $100,000

Additional working capital = $2,000

Salvage value = $23,000

A = Annual cost saving = $19,000

r = minimum pretax return = 13%, or 0.13

n = number of useful years of the machine = 9

The net present value of the proposed project is now calculated using the following steps:

Step 1: Calculation of the total cost

TC = Total cost = Machine cost + Additional working capital = $100,000 + $2,000 = $102,000

Step 2: Calculation of the present value of the annual cost saving

The present value of the annual cost saving can be calculated using the formula for calculating the present value of an ordinary annuity as follows:

PVACS = A * ((1 - (1 / (1 + r))^n) / r) …………………………………. (1)

Where;

PVACS = Present value of annual cost saving = ?

A = Annual cost saving = $19,000

r = Minimum pretax return = 13%, or 0.13

n = number of useful years of the machine = 9

Substituting the values into equation (1), we have:

PVACS = $19,000 * ((1 - (1 / (1 + 0.13))^9) / 0.13)

PVACS = $19,000 * 5.13165512782676

PVACS = $97,501.45

Step 3: Calculation of the present value of the salvage value and the recovered working capital

This can be calculated using the present value formula as follows:

PVSW = SW / (1 + r)^n ……………………….. (2)

Where;

PVSW = present value of the salvage value and the recovered working capital = ?

SW = salvage value and the recovered working capital = $23,000 + $2,000 = $25,000

r = Minimum pretax return = 13%, or 0.13

n = number of useful years of the machine = 9

Substituting the values into equation (2), we have:

PVSW = $25,000 / (1 + 0.13)^9

PVSW = $25,000 / 3.00404193798427

PVSW = $8,322.12

Step 4: Calculation of the net present value of the proposed project

This can be calculated as follows:

NPV = PVACS + PVSV - TC ……………………………. (3)

Where;

NPV = net present value of the proposed project = ?

PVACS = Present value of annual cost saving = $97,501.45

PVSW = present value of the salvage value and the recovered working capital = $8,322.12

TC = Total cost = Machine cost + Additional working capital = $100,000 + $2,000 = $102,000

Substituting the values into equation (3), we have:

NPV = $97,501.45 + $8,322.12 - $102,000

NPV = $3,824

From the options in the question, the calculated NPV of $3,823.57 is close to option A. $3,833. Therefore, the net present value of the proposed project is closest to $3,833.

3 0
3 years ago
Obtain the relevant authoritative literature on recognition of contingent losses. What is the specific eight-digit Codification
podryga [215]

Answer:

310-10-50-8

Codification citation for trade receivables that do not accrue interent until a specified period has elapsed, non accrual status would be the point when accrual is suspended after the receivable becomes past due.

Explanation:

Accounting standards codification is the source of authoritative generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) recognized by the FASB to be applied to non governmental entities.

6 0
4 years ago
John bought a waterfront lot with a setback requirement of 50 feet from the street. the lot is only 100 feet deep and drops off
LenKa [72]
<span>He would apply for a variance. This would allow John to deviate from the current zoning laws as set by the location that he is living in. This variance would give John the ability to build his home to the dimensions required by the land, as well as still being able to meet the specifications he is wanting.</span>
3 0
3 years ago
Assume that Saudi Arabia has production possibilities to produce either 100 barrels of oil using 100 worker hours or 25 bushels
Hatshy [7]

Answer: 10 bushels

Explanation:

If they produce 100 barrels of oil using 100 worker hours, it means that the number of work hours taken for 1 barrel is:

= 100 / 100

= 1 work hour

For bushels however, 1 worker hour produces:

= 25 / 100

= 0.25 bushels of corn

If 60 barrels of oil are produced, it means 60 worker hours were used which would leave 40 worker hours.

Bushels of corn produced is therefore:

= 40 * 0.25

= 10 bushels

5 0
3 years ago
The Bureau of Transportation Statistics Omnibus Household Survey is conducted annually and serves as an information source for t
sasho [114]

Answer:

a) For this case we have quantitative data since we have frequencies per each category.

b) For this case is better use percentages since we have frequency counts per each

c) First we need to calculate the total for the frequencies:

Total = 44+130+165+741= 1080 respondents

For this case we can calculate the percentage like this:

\% Strongly_{agree} = \frac{44}{1080} *100 =4.07\%

d) For this case the percentage of people who agree with allowing drivers of motor vehicles to talk on a hand-held cell phone while driving is just 4.07% and by the other hand the rest of the people correspond to 95.93%.

\frac{1036}{44}=23.55

The people who are NOT strongly agree is about 24 times greater than the peopl who strongly agrees.

So we can say that we don't have a general support for the claim.

Explanation:

For this case we have the following data given:

Number of respondents that they strongly agree with the statement = 44

Number of respondents that they somewhat agree with the statement = 130

Number of respondents that they somewhat disagree agree with the statement = 165

Number of respondents that they strongly disagree agree with the statement = 741

Part a

Do the responses for this statement provide categorical or quantitative data?

For this case we have quantitative data since we have frequencies per each category.

Part b

Would it make more sense to use averages or percentages as a summary of the responses for this statement?

For this case is better use percentages since we have frequency counts per each category so then not makes sense calculate averages for this case.

Part c

What percentage of respondents strongly agree with allowing drivers of motor vehicles to talk on a hand-held cell phone while driving?

First we need to calculate the total for the frequencies:

Total = 44+130+165+741= 1080 respondents

For this case we can calculate the percentage like this:

\% Strongly_{agree} = \frac{44}{1080} *100 =4.07\%

Part d

For this case the percentage of people who agree with allowing drivers of motor vehicles to talk on a hand-held cell phone while driving is just 4.07% and by the other hand the rest of the people correspond to 95.93%.

\frac{1036}{44}=23.55

The people who are NOT strongly agree is about 24 times greater than the peopl who strongly agrees.

So we can say that we don't have a general support for the claim.

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Lynn Amherst is a sales associate for Excel Realty. Lynn is preparing a classified ad for a listed property. The company's phone
    14·1 answer
  • A firm that manufactures TVs sells them at prices of $750, $1,000, and $1,250. The manufacturer will return $75, $100, or $125 r
    7·1 answer
  • Eldin is a house painter. he can paint three houses per week. he is considering hiring his friend murphy. together, eldin and mu
    12·1 answer
  • Rebecca sells her personal scooter for $550. she purchased the scooter for $700 three years ago. she also sells a painting for $
    15·1 answer
  • Which of the following is far more effective, has greater longevity, and has a far wider audience than advertising?
    13·1 answer
  • What is the important role of the government in market economies? A. to control prices and costs B. to prevent monopolies and co
    10·2 answers
  • Pursuant to a complete liquidation, Carrot Corporation distributes to its shareholders real estate held as an investment (basis
    14·1 answer
  • Suppose that real GDP per capita of the United States is $32,000 and its growth rate is 2% per year and that real GDP per capita
    15·1 answer
  • Assume a company is going to make an investment of $465,000 in a machine and the following are the cash flows that two different
    12·1 answer
  • Legislators may provide for special projects within their districts. This is called?
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!