Answer:
22.5 quarts
Step-by-step explanation:
Let us find the ratio of orange juice to apple juice. The punch requires 2 quarts of orange juice mixed with 5 quarts of apple juice.
The ratio of orange juice to apple juice is therefore:
2 : 5 or 2/5
Max has 9 quarts of orange juice. By comparing with the ratio, this implies that:
2 / 5 = 9 / x
x = (9 * 5) / 2 = 22.5 quarts
He will need 22.5 quarts of apple juice.
There seems to be a flaw with this question because it says that there are five x-intercepts but the given information only gives you 4 x-intercepts to work with.
Even means the graph is symmetric about the y-axis
The best answer is <span>A.(–6, 0), (–2, 0), and (0, 0)
because you do not have to worry about another point (0,0). Plus we need (-6,0) for it to be symmetric with (6,0).
Consider function f(x) = x²(x-6)(x+6)(x+2)</span>²(x-2)<span>². It is even and fits these conditions as it has x-intercepts at (6,0), (-6,0), (-2,0), (2,0), and (0,0). again, the question does not tell us the fifth x-intercept, so we need to assume that there is another one that needs to be there...and so (-2,0) must have (2,0) for it to be even as well.</span>
Cool thanks bro I appreciate it
Answer:
U it is DG if jug chuchi DG u want u back to the u and composition
Answer:
The degrees of freedom are given by:
And the p value would be:
Since the p value is lower than the significance level we have enough evidence to reject the null hypothesis and we can conclude that the true mean is significantly higher than 2.3 ppm the safe limit
Step-by-step explanation:
Information provided
represent the sample mean in ppm
represent the sample standard deviation
sample size
represent the value to verify
represent the significance level
t would represent the statistic
represent the p value
System of hypothesis
We want to verify if the true mean is higher than 2,3 ppm, the system of hypothesis would be:
Null hypothesis:
Alternative hypothesis:
The statistic for this case is given by:
(1)
Replacing the info given we got:
The degrees of freedom are given by:
And the p value would be:
Since the p value is lower than the significance level we have enough evidence to reject the null hypothesis and we can conclude that the true mean is significantly higher than 2.3 ppm the safe limit
