Answer: C
Step-by-step explanation:
1) 11x = 33, x = 3
**2) x/3 = 3, x = 9** has different solution
3) x - 2 = 1, x = 3
4) x + 9 = 12, x = 3
<h3>
Answer: Choice A</h3>
The graph has <u>no</u> vertical asymptote
===========================================================
Explanation:
Let's simplify the function by factoring each piece.
In the 2nd step, I used the difference of squares rule to factor the numerator. In the 4th step, the (x-8) terms cancel.
The simplified version doesn't have any variables in the denominator. This indicates the denominator is always 8, and never 0. So it's impossible to divide by zero in this simplified form. Consequently it means this graph <u>has no vertical asymptotes.</u>
However, there is a hole at x = 8 because this input causes a division by zero error in the original non-simplified function. Why? Because the calculator will use PEMDAS to evaluate the expression after replacing every copy of x with 8. It likely won't attempt to simplify like shown in the steps above. This is what causes the hole at x = 8.
The value x = -8 is perfectly fine in either the original function or the simplified one. It doesn't cause the denominator to be zero.
The answer should be A. In order to solve these half-life problems, I encourage you to find an algebra calculator online, and plug in these numbers. The remaining grams goes in front, so 3.
The entire equation should look something like 3 = 15(1/2)^t/4.95
The 4.95 represents how long it takes before the sample halves, t is your answer, 1/2 represents the value halving every 4.95 hours, 15 is the initial sample size, and 3 is the end result that remains.
The overall answer should be about 11.5 hours, as per an algebra calculator.
Hope this helps solve any other similar problems
15.89$ spent on Seven monster drinks hope it helped:)