Answer: A
Step-by-step explanation: Hope this help :D
Answer:
4
Step-by-step explanation:
Is that a log with the base of 3√(2) ?
If so....my calculator says the answer is 4
Let's see if we can do it w/ou the calculator:
3 sqrt(2)^x = 324 = 3^4 * 2^2 Now 'LOG' both sides:
x log (3 sqrt 2) = log (3^4 *2^2) = 4 log ( 3 * 2^(2/4)) = 4 log (3 sqrt2)
now divide both sides by log (3 sqrt2 )
x = 4 (If I did the math correctly ! )
<span>Use the slope intercept form y=<span><span>mx</span>+b, </span></span><span>where </span><span>m</span><span> is the slope and </span><span>b</span><span> is the y-intercept. So with saying that plug your problem in so y = -3x+3 so your answer would be m=-3 which is the slope.
~Hope this Helps! Good Luck!~
</span>
The answer is 2/1, I think. :)
Answer:
A) None
Step-by-step explanation:
1) 
shoudnt neccesarily be a factor of nst, for example, if s = 3, t = 4, and n = 12, then both s and t are factors of n, but 
is not a factor of nst = 144.
2) 
shoudnt neccesarily be a factor of nst. Let s be 4, let t be 6, and let n be 12. Then n is a factor of both s and t, but 
is not a factor of nst = 12*24. In fact, it is a greater number.
3) Again, s+t isnt necessarily a factor of nst, let s be 2 and t be 3. Then both s and t are factor of n = 12. However 5 = s+t is not a factor of nst = 72.
So, neither of the three options is guaranteed to be a factor of nst. In fact, for s = 4, t = 6, and n = 12, none of the three options are valid.
