Answer: control
Explanation: When project managers reduce the intensity of the conflict by smoothing over differences or interjecting humor when dysfunctional conflict arises, they are attempting to control the conflict.
<span>The concept that ethnicities have the right to govern themselves is known as the r</span>ight of people to self-determination. This rule states that groups of people have right to choose their sovereignty, it means to decide that they want to form an independent state. The most important periods when this rule was applied were after the World War I, World War II and in the 1990s when many independent states emerged from former empires (the Great Britain or the Soviet Union) in Africa, Eastern Europe and Asia.
Nowadays this rule is on the one hand accepted but on the other still controversial when it comes to rights of ethnicities which strive for independence (ex. Scotland from the UK, Catalonia from Spain or Palestina from Israel).
Yes they should because if they are more active than they can be healthier and perform better in school
The option that is an example of spillover costs is A. a manufacturer continues to pollute a river because it does not pay the costs for cleaning it.
<u>'Spillover costs' refers to a consequence that affects a third party that has not taken part in a decision</u>. In other words, 'spillover costs' makes reference to the damage provoked by another person to a third party. This idea is often used to talk about pollution, as it happens in option A). In this case,<u> the consequences of pollution experienced by the third party, who must pay the costs for cleaning pollution, are the spillover costs</u>.
We took away a nation's independence and culture.
I think that it was wrong for the U.S. to take Hawaii because Hawaii was already a literate country with a developed government that was functioning well. The Hawaiian people did not need the United States to come into their nation and "educate" them or help them in any way. They were literate, had their own language, had their own government, had their own culture. America took over the Hawaiian Kingdom for its strategic military opportunities and for economic prosperity. The U.S. Came to Hawaii and wiped out their culture, spread diseases that the natives had no immunity to, and took their independence away from them. Once Hawaii was annexed to the U.S., their culture was crushed. Hula dancing (a way of honoring their chiefs, gods, and land) was outlawed, books in the Hawaiian language were burned, and the unique flora and fauna was destroyed to build hotels, restaurants, and other businesses that worked to increase tourism. The view on Hawaiian culture was also changed because of the annexation. Most people today see it as an island paradise filled with exotic sights and entertainment, looking past the rich history and real native culture. I think that we should have let Hawaii stay governed by the monarchy and let them be independent. It was not our place to take over and it was unfair that we did. We almost eliminated their culture and their people.
