Answer:
Option (C) is correct.
Explanation:
In an unregulated market, negative externality results in a higher social marginal cost than the firm marginal cost because this market is not properly regulated by the government officials. Hence, these firms are not taking into account the effect of negative externalities in their cost.
We know that the consumer's decision is more offenly based on the point where the marginal cost is equal to the marginal benefit because they are not taking the impact of negative externalities.
If proper action is not taken by the government, negative externality will result in a market inefficiencies.
Answer:
b. All rocks in the Earth's crust will, at some point, be subducted and melted to create igneous rock.
Explanation:
There are 3 types of rock:
1. Igneous, wich are formed when 2 tectonic plates collide and magma goes to surface getting cold
2. Sedimentary: when many layers of preexistent rocks produce pressure and heat by weigth melting the rocks.
3. Metamorphic: a new rock is formed by chemical and/or physical reaction over preexistent rocks
Sedimentary and metamorphic would be subducted in order to produce new igneus rocks.
If they have alot of money then it might be hard for them to save because they have enough or if they dont have alot of money then they just wanna have alot of items i do that sometimes☺
B.) moral I think. Hope this helps
Answer and Explanation:
a. This is a fundamental risk case since there is a loss possibility. As the attack is done by the terrorists and the loss is definite in terms
b. It is a property risk as the house is damaged in a fire that resulted into a financial loss
c. It is a personal risk case as the head of the family is totally disabled that directly impact the family which leads to non-fulfillment of the financial liabilities so ultimately its an income loss.
d. It is a case of speculative as the investor purchase 100 shares that resulted in either profit or loss
e. This is a case of fundamental risk as the overflow of the river impacts the property of thousands people
f. This is a case of financial risk as the risk impacted the opposite changes in the price of the commodity, rate of interest, etc
g. It is a speculative case as the worker could either win or loss
