<em><u>Question:</u></em>
Is square root of 1.6875 a rational number ?
<em><u>Answer:</u></em>
Square root of 1.6875 a rational number is not a rational number
<em><u>Solution:</u></em>
Given that we have to find square root of 1.6875 and determine if it is rational number or not
Let us first find square root of 1.6875
Let us understand about rational number
A rational number is a number that can be expressed as a fraction (ratio) in the form 
where p and q are integers and q is not zero.
When a rational number fraction is divided to form a decimal value, it becomes a terminating or repeating decimal.
So the number 1.29903810568 is not a rational number
<em><u>In other words we can say,</u></em>
Only the square roots of square numbers are rational. Here 1.6875 is not a perfect square. So it is not rational number
The only true statement that compares the two functions is:
B: The solution to f(x)=g(x) is 1
<h3>
Which statements are correct?</h3>
Here we have the functions:
f(x) = |x - 3| + 1
g(x) = 2x + 1
First, let's find the solution for:
f(x) = g(x)
|x - 3| + 1 = 2x + 1
|x - 3| = 2x
Notice that we have two options, x = 3:
|3 - 3| = 2*3
0 = 6 (x = 3 is not a solution)
And x = 1:
|1 - 3| = 2*1
2 = 2 (x = 1 is a solution).
Now to get the y-value where the graphs intersect, we just evaluate one of the functions in the solution we found above;
f(1) = |1 - 3| + 1 = 2 + 1 = 3
The graphs intersect when y = 3.
Then we conclude that the only true statement is:
B: The solution to f(x)=g(x) is 1
If you want to learn more about systems of equations, you can read:
brainly.com/question/13729904
Answer:
$14233.12
Step-by-step explanation:
10,000(1+.04/1)^1(9)
Answer:
18
Step-by-step explanation:
For this problem, we will simply plug in the values of a and b into the respective variables in the expression 3ab to "evaluate" the expression.
a = 2; b = 3
3ab
Note, that when variables like a and b are smashed with a constant, the use of multiplication is in play.
3ab = 3 * a * b
With this in mind, let's plug in the values of a and b into the expression.
3ab
= 3 (2) (3)
= 3 (6)
= 18
Hence, 3ab evaluated when a=2 and b=3 is 18.
Cheers.
Well, they are equivalent, but I'm not sure if that's exactly what you're asking. :)
