Answer:
It is not due to the fact it has no variable
X= 14 + 9y over 2
y= -x - 7 over 6
There isn't enough info to prove the triangles to be congruent or not. So we can't say for sure either way.
We have angle CAD = angle ACB given by the arc markings, and we know that AC = AC due to the reflexive theorem. However we are missing one third piece of information.
That third piece of info could be....
- AD = BC which allows us to use SAS
- angle ACD = angle CAB which allows us to use ASA
- angle ABC = angle CDA which allows us to use AAS (slight variation of ASA)
Since we don't know any of those three facts, we simply don't have enough information.
side note: If AB = CD, then this leads to SSA which is not a valid congruence theorem. If we had two congruent sides, the angle must be between the two sides, which is what AD = BC allows.
Answer:
40, 2000, 50
Step-by-step explanation:
I am not sure, but if you find any other answer, you can use this numbers
Answer:
The answer is D.7
Step-by-step explanation:
Just look at the table :)