Glucose turns into ATP or ENERGY during the process of cellular respiration ..
<span>The glucose is broken down into 2 molecules of pyruvate, which are two smaller molecules. A net yeild of 2 ATP and 2 NADH result. Each pyruvate is connected to a coenzyme. The resulting molecule is called Acetyl CoA. That reaction also gives off 2 molecules of C02. The Acetyl CoA enters the Krebs Cycle, from which (through a series of steps), 2 more ATP, 6 NADH, 2 FADH2, and 6 CO2 are formed. The 6 NADH and FADH2 (which are coenzymes) move on to the electron transfer chain. Here, they give up their H+ and electrons to the chain. The electrons reduced the proteins on the chain, allowing H+ from outside the cell to be brought in. Bringing this H+ into the cell builds up the concentration. When the concentration gets high enough, the H+ wants to go back out of the cell. The only way to do this is through the ATP synthase. When is passes through this, the synthase combines an ADP with an inorganic phosphate, forming ATP. The typical yeild is 32 ATP from this, giving a total of 36 when you add in the ATP from glycolysis and the Krebs cycle.</span>
Glucose is broken down during fermentation anaerobically
The atoms are conserved in both physical and chemical processes during cellular respiration.
Hope that helps
<u>Evolution is sometimes a controversial:</u>
Evolution is the most scientific explanation about how the life forms of earth originated and turned into the form that we see today.
I don’t think there should be a controversy because there is no other explanation that proves to be more logical than the theory of evolution. Evolution is a theory that has several supporting proofs and the theory itself was formed after several years of detailed study and observation.
I don’t think alternatives to evolution should be taught at schools. Alternative theories to evolution are based on various religious beliefs which lack a scientific basis.
Schools should be a place that enables students to do productive scientific thinking and teaching alternatives to evolution wouldn’t be a good idea.
