Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
Assuming the system is solvable in the first place, create an augmented matrix of coefficients from the equations. Then put the matrix into reduced row echelon form.
Example is attached.
"Demonstrate by solving the following system."
You need to provide the system of equations.
A common misconception in statistics is confusing correlation with causation. If two events are correlated, it merely means that they share the same behaviour over time, but it doesn't imply in any way that those event are related by a common cause, or even worse, that one implies the other.
You can find several (even humorous) counter examples online. For example, if you plot the number of reported pirates assault against the global temperature in the last years, you'll se that temperature is rising (unfortunately...) while pirates are almost disappearing.
One could observe this strong negative correlation and claim that hotter climate has solved the pirate issue. Of course this is a joke, but it explains why you shouldn't confuse correlation with causation.
Answer:
x = 3
Step-by-step explanation:
Subtract 8x from both sides.
3x+4−8x=8x−11−8x
−5x+4=−11
Subtract 4 from both sides.
−5x+4−4=−11−4
−5x=−15
Divide both sides by -5.
−5x
−5
=
−15
−5
x=3
In a table it's EXAMPLE: Cars/Drivers the cars is x and the drivers is y(y-intercept). In an equation, EXAMPLE using y=mx+b the b is the y-int., and in a graph it is (x,y) the y being the y-int.
No, it actually is not!
If you are to change it to a number,
14.5% = .145
