He forced visits. thats what i got at least
Answer:
True
Explanation:
In the Daubert case, The case is tainted because the defendant provided 'expert witness' to give testimony in the favor, but the testimonies that given contradict the common scientific knowledge that is held by scientific community. Even though this happen, the juries still rule in favor of the defendant simply because they brought 'an expert'.
To prevent this from happening again, the supreme court created rule 702 which restrict the type of expert testimonies that are admissible in court.
Answer:
Explanation:
The people in a country or area who normally work and earn money.
Hope it helps you!
Answer:
The food worker on break may drink from an uncovered cup in the kitchen.
Explanation:
To begin with, the people who come to dine in wouldn't be exactly happy to witness the food worker to drink water in the deli area or the buffet area or in the dining room. Those would be the places where the water would be served or placed for the people who come to eat. It is a safe mannerism if the food worker drinks water from the kitchen as it is more appropriate and right thing to do. As basic rules, a dining place would know how to keep the place hygienic and clean and kitchen would be the place where the uncovered cup would be kept clean, especially for the workers' sake.
