Answer:
Informed
Explanation:
An informed voter is up to date on current issues and the policies of all of the candidates
Answer:
d. bound by the contract, under a theory of agency by estoppel
Explanation:
Marisol is bound by the contract because during the negotiation Charlie and Jamal, he created an appearance that will make Jamal believe that Charlie was his agent, he did not counter the claim that the bicycle was up for sale. Under the theory of agency by estoppel, a contract exist and is binding on a principal when he or she creates the appearance of an agency even though it actually does not exist. The action of Marisol created the impression that Charlie is his agent even though he actually is not so the contract is binding on him to sell the bicycle to Jamal.
I think the summary judgement would be inappropriate in this case
Summary judgement is entered by the court if the plaintiff does not have sufficient evidence that the defendants actually do what they're accused of before moving to trial.
On this case, There is a strong proof that peoples restaurant is aware of Hoag's alcoholism : <u>intoxicated</u>
This mean that sabo can proof that the bar know hoag is an alcoholic and had served enough amount to hoag to get him intoxicated.
This mean that Sabo's case is strong enough to be brought to the trial. keep in mind that Sabo is unlikely to win the trial since the restaurant does not directly involved in the accident. but we can definitely say that summary judgement would be inappropriate in this case.
The very first known group were the pelasgians
Answer:
Yes it does.
Explanation: In a presidential system, the president is elected directly by the people.
