If the sentence above is trying to ask whether it is true or false, the answer is false. It is ethical egoism does not view the moral judgment in terms of the beliefs of the society, but rather, it only does a judgment or an obligation because of their own self and not because of the society. That's why the answer is false.
Answer
Yes
Explanation:
According to the Central Limit Theorem, the sample size, being n larger than 30, is representative of the Standford students´ use of the drug, in this case, being ecstasy. Another reason why the procedure works is the random sampling, where the assistants made sure that the only characteristic that mattered was being a student; gender, major being pursued, age, etc. were not of relevance.
Answer:
Customer contact
Explanation:
In business, customer contact can be seen as the physical presence of a customer in a service system.
There are high customer contact services and low customer contact services.
Services with high customer contact include those that there is need for the business to have the physical presence of the customer around the service premises to function better. they include:
Health centers, public transportation, fitness centers, schools and restaurants
Services with low customer contact include those that there is no need for the business to have the physical presence of the customer around the service premises to function better. they include:
Chemical plants, manufacturing companies.
The correct answer is letter C.
Explanation: Cross-cultural Immersion is the experience of being a member of a cultural minority while surrounded by a different majority culture.
Answer:
The main point here on the appeal would be the fact that the Sherrods decided to stay silent on the last offer made by the Kidds to settle the situation, and rather decided to go ahead and look for a mandatory arbitration. When the Sherrods did that, the Kidds might have understood that they were not accepting their offer for 34.000 dollars and preffered to settle for the result of the mandatory arbitration, which established the price at 25.000 dollars.
Another point is that there was a big time lapse between the last offer made by the Kidds to settle with the Sherrods and their communicating that they would go for that final settlement offer, especially after the mandatory arbitration had already established a new price. This time lapse should also be taken in favor of the Kidds in their appeal
Finally, the matter should have ended when the final decision for the arbitration was given
So it should be expected that on appeal the decision reached in the mandatory arbritration be upheld, instead of the new sum which was initially assumed not accepted by the Sherrods when they went through with the arbitration.