1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
NikAS [45]
2 years ago
13

Nayeli has a points card for a movie theater.

Mathematics
2 answers:
Arisa [49]2 years ago
5 0

Answer: She would have to visit the movie theater 10 times.

Step-by-step explanation:

77julia77 [94]2 years ago
4 0

Step-by-step explanation:

I am not sure what the actual question is.

the general function for the amount of gathered reward points p with v visits to the theater is

p(v) = 14.5×v + 40 (40 starting points, 14.5 points per visit)

to know how many visits are needed for a certain amount of points (185) we need to solve that equation for v :

185 = 14.5×v + 40

145 = 14.5×v

v = 145/14.5 = 10

so, she needs at least 10 visits to gather the desired 185 points for a free ticket.

but that applies only to the first free ticket.

after that the function behavior kind of changes, because we have no more starting points :

so to get 2×185 = 370 points for 2 free tickets she will need

370 = 14.5×v + 40

330 = 14.5×v

v = 330/14.5 = 22.75862069...

we need to round up to the next whole number (because there can be no "part-visits").

so, she will need 23 visits for 2 free tickets (that means 13 more visits for the second free ticket).

You might be interested in
Find the missing length. The triangles in each pair are similar.
nikitadnepr [17]
The answer is D.13
21/7=3
39/3=13
3 0
3 years ago
The table below shows some inputs and outputs of the invertible function f with domain all real numbers.
Alexandra [31]
Hi hi I hope you know that I
8 0
3 years ago
The director of admissions at the University of Maryland, University College is concerned about the high cost of textbooks for t
nadezda [96]

Answer:

a. There is evidence that the population mean is above $300.

b. There is no evidence that the population mean is above $300.

c. There is no evidence that the population mean is above $300.

d. The director could ask for cheaper similar books.

Step-by-step explanation:

Let X be the random variable that represents the cost of textbooks. We have observed n = 25 values, \bar{x} = 315.4 and s = 43.20. We suppose that X is normally distributed.

We have the following null and alternative hypothesis

H_{0}: \mu = 300 vs H_{1}: \mu > 300 (upper-tail alternative)

We will use the test statistic

T = \frac{\bar{X}-300}{S/\sqrt{25}} and the observed value is

t_{0} = \frac{315.4 - 300}{43.20/\sqrt{25}} = 1.7824.

If H_{0} is true, then T has a t distribution with n-1 = 24 degrees of freedom.

a. The rejection region is given by RR = {t | t > t_{0.9}} where t_{0.9} = 1.3178 is the 90th quantile of the t distribution with 24 df, so, RR = {t | t > 1.3178}. Because the observed value satisty 1.7824 > 1.3178, there is evidence that the population mean is above $300.

b. If s = 75, then the observed value is t_{0} = \frac{315.4 - 300}{75/\sqrt{25}} = 1.0267. The rejection region for a 0.05 level of significance is RR = {t | t > t_{0.95}} where t_{0.95} = 1.7108 is the 95th quantile of the t distribution with 24 df, so, RR = {t | t > 1.7108}. Because the observed value does not fall inside the rejection region, there is no evidence that the population mean is above $300.

c. If \bar{x} = 305.11 and s = 43.20, the observed value is t_{0} = \frac{305.11 - 300}{43.20/\sqrt{25}} =  0.5914. For RR = {t | t > 1.3178} we have that the observed value does not fall inside RR, therefore, there is no evidence that the population mean is above $300.

d. Because the director of admissions is concerned about the high cost of textbooks, and there is evidence that the population mean of costs is above $300, the director could ask for cheaper similar books.

8 0
3 years ago
A company sells widgets. The amount of profit, y, made by the company, is related to the selling price of each widget, x, by the
sineoko [7]

Answer:

x = $34.45

Step-by-step explanation:

Solution:-

The company makes a profit of $y by selling widgets at a price of $x. The profit model is represented by a parabola ( quadratic ) equation as follows:

                       y = -10x^2 + 689x -6775

We are to determine the profit maximizing selling price ( x )

From the properties of a parabola equation of the form:

                      y = ax^2 + bx + c

The vertex ( turning point ) or maximum/minimum point is given as:

                     x = -\frac{b}{2a} \\\\x = - \frac{689}{2*(-10)} =  \frac{689}{20}\\\\x = 34.45

The profit maximizing selling price of widgets would be x = $34.45.

4 0
3 years ago
PLEASE HELP!!! I'M ON A TIMER!! (20 POINTS) Which method correctly solves the equation using the distributive property? Negative
iragen [17]

Answer:

last one is correct

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • The answer and to understand
    6·2 answers
  • PLZ HELP!!! 20 POINTS!!!<br><br> 1. Solve the system of equations by graphing: x + y = 3
    15·1 answer
  • I need to start with learning my multiplication tables is their a audio for this
    10·2 answers
  • If anyone can help me with the second question ASAP thx
    6·2 answers
  • Please help!! Will give u brainliest!
    5·2 answers
  • Consider the line 4x + 7y=-1.
    7·1 answer
  • CAN SOMEONE PLEASE HELP ME THIS TEST WAS DUE 2 DAYS AGO I ONLY GOT 10 MIN LEFT AND IM ONLY ON QUESTION 2 HELPPPP!
    13·1 answer
  • Plz help me well mark brainliest if correct...?????
    15·1 answer
  • What is 3(2x -5) + 10 ≥ 25?
    7·2 answers
  • Biologists have discovered that the shoulder height h (in centimeters) of a male African elephant can be modeled by where t is t
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!