Not Germany or England at all sorry if im wrong
The
Answer is false, because Rawls- Paradigmatic Shift: A Theory of Justice <span>
Rawls' goal: to replace intuitionism with a theory of
rational choice
Reject utilitarianism, which would leave individual rights
vulnerable and thus be irrational
Rawls' substantive theory: a well-ordered society is governed
by two principles
1. The equal liberty principle
2. The difference principle: social goods are to be
distributed equally unless some earn
Rawls' methodological contribution: Political theory can
validate universal norms.
His two principles are the rational choice of everyone who
accepts certain compelling assumptions in an Original Position like
• Humans seek autonomy
• Everyone is shrouded in a "veil of ignorance"
<span>• Everyone adopts a "maximin" conception of
rationality</span></span>
Answer:
This could be seen as loss of patience
Explanation:
The mother was unable to hold her patience and endure the unruly behaviour of her children which was why she had to swat one of them on the bottom.
She should have been patient to the children because children are always known for there behaviour.
I feel like it's A because Japan and the U.S don't really have such a bad connection anymore. If they did, they would still be in war.
Advantages for whom ? Generally, in a smaller family the resources are distributed among fewer people, which means that the children can get a better education and more support and the parents don't need to work us much (e.g. double shifts) to support their family. For the whole state, a 2+2 model is also the most sustainable, where there are no drastic differences in population age over time:the number of people stays constant if everyone has around 2 children.
