Answer: C) 6.0025
Step-by-step explanation:
The equation for the area of a circle requires the radius, you put in the full diameter. Just divide 4.9 by 2, which gives you 2.45. 2.45 squared is equal to 6.0025 and then slap your pi on to the end of it.
Let's simplify step-by-step.<span><span><span>6x</span>−<span>9x</span></span>−5</span><span>=<span><span><span><span><span>6x</span>+</span>−<span>9x</span></span>+</span>−5</span></span>Combine Like Terms:<span>=<span><span><span>6x</span>+<span>−<span>9x</span></span></span>+<span>−5</span></span></span><span>=<span><span>(<span><span>6x</span>+<span>−<span>9x</span></span></span>)</span>+<span>(<span>−5</span>)</span></span></span><span>=<span><span>−<span>3x</span></span>+<span>−5</span></span></span>Answer:<span>=<span><span>−<span>3x</span></span>−<span>5</span></span></span>
Answer:
0
Step-by-step explanation:
the opposite is 1 -7/8 when you add them together they cancel out to zero
Answer:
hello your question lacks the required options attached is a picture of the complete question
One would expect about 5% of tests to be significant just by chance if the null hypothesis is true, and for 60 tests, this is 0.05(60) = 3 tests. This could explain why these tests are statistically significant.
Step-by-step explanation:
What is misleading about this is the study's final report because this marketing study was carried out with a level of significance of 5% (0.05) which means that if we carry the same study with varying sample data we will mostly like arrive at a conclusion against our null conclusion 5% of the time and this is not good for the the study because it is a type 1 error and has to be eliminated and it cannot be eliminated totally .
hence One would expect about 5% of tests to be significant just by chance if the null hypothesis is true, and for 60 tests, this is 0.05(60) = 3 tests. This could explain why these tests are statistically significant.