Since it's y/x, and x is what you input into the function (and y is what you get out), we get that the amount donated is based off of the lunch specials, so we get y(12)/x(60)=12/60=1/5Since it's y/x, and x is what you input into the function (and y is what you get out), we get that the amount donated is based off of the lunch specials, so we get y(12)/x(60)=12/60=1/5.
Answer:
There is not sufficient evidence to support the claim that the technique performs differently than the traditional method.
Step-by-step explanation:
The null hypothesis is:

The alternate hypotesis is:

The test statistic is:

In which X is the sample mean,
is the value tested at the null hypothesis,
is the standard deviation and n is the size of the sample.
A researcher used the technique with 260 students and observed that they had a mean of 94 hours. Assume the standard deviation is known to be 6.
This means, respectively, that 
The test-statistic is:



The pvalue is:
2(P(Z < -2.69))
P(Z < -2.69) is the pvalue of Z when X = -2.69, which looking at the z-table, is 0.0036
2*(0.0036) = 0.0072
0.0072 < 0.01, which means that the null hypothesis is accepted, that is, there is not sufficient evidence to support the claim that the technique performs differently than the traditional method.
Answer:
it's 190 which mean C
Step-by-step explanation:
Let Jane use 'X' lace.
Then,
Marcus uses '3X' lace [ according to the question]
Here,
X + 3X = 64
4X = 64
X = 16
So, Jane uses 16 laces and
Marcus uses 3*16 = 48 laces