Answer:
The field of psychology would see Dr. Copycat's research as a replica of Dr. Original's original research. In that case, Dr. Copycat's experiment would be considered honest if, during publication, credits were provided for Dr. Original's research.
Explanation:
It is acceptable for scientific research to be replicated by different researchers. However, the publication of a scientific research classified as a replica must contain credits to the original research, otherwise it will be considered plagiarism.
In this case, in relation to the example shown in the question above, we can say that the field of psychology would see Dr. Copycat's research as a replica of the original research, carried out by Dr. Original. In that case, Dr. Copycat's experiment would be considered honest if, during publication, credits were provided for Dr. Original's research.
They converse about each other's personalities, about treating people directly and on equal terms. It seems to her that Rochester sometimes speaks as if he were reading her mind.
Blaming one’s self in a bid to offer explanations for bad
events usually leads to a depressed mood which in turn leads to behavioral
withdrawal and then, the later pain of a feeling of loneliness. This best
illustrates that depression may involve A VICIOUS CYCLE
Answer:
Rational
Explanation:
The basis of the rational method of test construction is to come up with items that seem directly, obviously, and logically related to what it is
you wish to measure. The rational method is a simple technique for estimating a design discharge from a small watershed that is design of many small structures
Answer:
Mosaic
I have learnt it last year
It's done with many pieces of paper
