1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
masha68 [24]
3 years ago
11

The Southern Manifesto was a document that declared the intent of

History
1 answer:
barxatty [35]3 years ago
8 0

The southern Manifesto was a document that declered the intent of opposition to racial integration of public places.

<h3>Why was there a racial opposition in the South?</h3>

The southern part of the country at the time were the confederates. These people were against a United States where a black man and a white man had equal powers.

The black man was seen as an inferior person and a slave to the white man. Therefore they were not seen as a part of the white society.

Read more on the Southern Manifesto  here:

brainly.com/question/26992110

You might be interested in
Identify the principle acknowledged by the Supreme Court case Marbury v. Madison.
nika2105 [10]

Answer:

A. Judicial Review

Explanation:

The U.S. Supreme Court case Marbury v. Madison (1803) established the principle of judicial review—the power of the federal courts to declare legislative and executive acts unconstitutional. The unanimous opinion was written by Chief Justice John Marshall.

7 0
3 years ago
Explain why Duars were important to Bhutanese.​
Andreyy89

Answer:

follow

Explanation:

Britain sent a peace mission to Bhutan in early 1864, in the wake of the recent conclusion of a civil war there, under Ashley Eden.[1] The dzongpon of Punakha – who had emerged victorious – had broken with the central government and set up a rival Druk Desi while the legitimate druk desi sought the protection of the penlop of Paro and was later deposed. The British mission dealt alternately with the rival penlop of Paro and the penlop of Trongsa (the latter acted on behalf of the druk desi), but Bhutan rejected the peace and friendship treaty it offered partially because of the previous unilateral British annexation of some Assam duars. Britain declared war in November 1864. Bhutan had no regular army, and what forces existed were composed of dzong guards armed with matchlocks, bows and arrows, swords, knives, and catapults. Some of these dzong guards, carrying shields and wearing chainmail armor, engaged the well-equipped British forces.

Storming of Dewangiri fort.

The fort, known at the time as Dewangiri, at Deothang was dismantled by the British during 1865. The British initially suffered a humiliating defeat at Deothang and when they recaptured Dewangiri they destroyed much in an attempt to compensate.

The Duar War lasted only five months and, despite some battlefield victories by Bhutanese forces which included the capture of two howitzer guns, resulted in the loss of 20% of Bhutan's territory, and forced cession of formerly occupied territories.[2] Under the terms of the Treaty of Sinchula, signed 11 November 1865, Bhutan ceded territories in the Assam Duars and Bengal Duars, as well as the 83 km² of territory of Dewangiri in southeastern Bhutan, in return for an annual subsidy of 50,000 rupees. The Treaty of Sinchula stood until 1910, when Bhutan and British India signed the Treaty of Punakha, effective until 1947.

5 0
3 years ago
Who owned most of the bonanza farms that developed in the late 1800s?
Alisiya [41]
Oliver Dalrymple owned the farm in the late 1800's.

5 0
3 years ago
1. What does the menu description in paragraph 3 reveal about how the narrator views her
BaLLatris [955]

Answer:

1) B

2) A

3) C

4) A

5) A

6) D

Discussion Questions

1. Minister's family is American and the speaker's family is Chinese, so they acted in different ways because everybody has their own culture and customs. Every culture is different and the person who is following a particular culture must be very satisfised. This is the reason why they acted so differently.

I don't know the rest sorry

Good luck!

7 0
3 years ago
Are the concerns that Washington had about the nation's foreign affairs still applicable today? Why/why not?
Gelneren [198K]

Answer:

He urges the American people to avoid long-term friendly relations or rivalries with any nation, arguing that attachments with or animosity toward other nations will only cloud the government's judgment in its foreign policy

Explanation:

That was a long time ago when the government was still forming, everybody had there concerns. Now there are people who`s jobs are specifically for maintaining foreign affairs.  

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • During the Napoleonic Wars, Britain and France each tried to?
    10·2 answers
  • 1. What information can you derive about those who composed the Mayflower Compact?
    6·1 answer
  • Anong kapangyarihan ng wika na tumatanaw sa mga bagay sa magkasalungat na paraan?
    12·1 answer
  • Which constitutional amendment abolished (got rid of) slavery in the united states?
    6·1 answer
  • What’s geographic obstacles did alexander’s army face
    8·1 answer
  • Which was a result of the Boston tea party?
    7·1 answer
  • What did Hatshepsut contribution to ancient Egyptian Socially?
    8·1 answer
  • Which practice is most likely to have been supported by conservatives in Europe in the 1800s?
    5·1 answer
  • What is the Executive Office of the President, and what are its duties?
    12·1 answer
  • What important decisions did the ianta conference make? consequences of those decisions.
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!