It’s 10
Shejjejdjdjdbxhxgebnsx Dnnd hansjdbdbdbdbbdbdh
Answer:
c. Spencer will win because regardless of whether Glen was acting within the scope of his employment, Sally is liable for his negligence.
Explanation:
Spencer will win because regardless of whether Glen was acting within the scope of his employment, Sally is liable for his negligence. Sally is obligated for his carelessness. Since Sally employed Glen and the obligation of any carelessness turns into Sally's inevitably.
Answer:
terry v. ohio
Explanation:
Terry v. Ohio, in 1968, was a major decision of the Supreme Court of the United States in which the Court ruled that the Fourth Amendment's prohibition on unreasonable searches and seizures is not in violation when a police officer stops a suspect on the street and frisks him or her without probable cause to arrest, if the police officer has a reasonable suspicion that the person has committed, is committing, or is about to commit a crime and has a reasonable belief that the person "may be armed and presently dangerous."
1.put your right foot on the brake,put your right hand on the gear selector lever and make sure it’s in park
2.make sure the parking brake is set
3.turn on the ignition key to the start position and start the vehicle
4.let the engine idle
5. While the engine ideals check gauges and warning lights to make sure everything is okay
6. Put the vehicle in drive or reverse
Stare decisis is a legal doctrine that obligates courts to follow historical cases when making a ruling on a similar case. ... Simply put, it binds courts to follow legal precedents set by previous decisions. Stare decisis is a Latin term meaning "to stand by that which is decided."
