Answer:
0.96
Step-by-step explanation:
try
Answer:
See explanation
Step-by-step explanation:
Consider triangles CAX and BAX. In these triangles,
- given
- given
- reflexive property
By SAS postulate, ![\triangle CAX\cong \triangle BAX](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Ctriangle%20CAX%5Ccong%20%5Ctriangle%20BAX)
Congruent triangles have conruent corresponding parts. So,
![\overline{CX}\cong \overline{BX}](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Coverline%7BCX%7D%5Ccong%20%5Coverline%7BBX%7D)
Consider triangles CXY and BXY. In these triangles,
- proven
- given
- reflexive property
By SAS postulate, ![\triangle CXY\cong \triangle BXY](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Ctriangle%20CXY%5Ccong%20%5Ctriangle%20BXY)
Congruent triangles have conruent corresponding parts. So,
![\angle XCY\cong \angle XBY](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Cangle%20XCY%5Ccong%20%5Cangle%20XBY)
Are there aby answer choices?
Answer:
False
Step-by-step explanation:
5 3/8 > 5 4/10