Divide. enter your solution as a mixed number.

The number 0.4 can be written as 4/10, so it is a rational number?

riadik2000 [5.3K]

Hello,

Yes of course 0.4 or 4/10 is a rational number :)

Have a nice day :)

5 0

3 years ago

Some scientists believe alcoholism is linked to social isolation. One measure of social isolation is marital status. A study of

frez [133]

Answer:

1) H0: There is independence between the marital status and the diagnostic of alcoholic

H1: There is association between the marital status and the diagnostic of alcoholic

2) The statistic to check the hypothesis is given by:

$\sum_{i=1}^n \frac{(O_i -E_i)^2}{E_i}$

3) $\chi^2 = \frac{(21-33.143)^2}{33.143}+\frac{(37-41.429)^2}{41.429}+\frac{(58-41.429)^2}{41.429}+\frac{(59-46.857)^2}{46.857}+\frac{(63-58.571)^2}{58.571}+\frac{(42-58.571)^2}{58.571} =19.72$

4) $df=(rows-1)(cols-1)=(3-1)(2-1)=2$

And we can calculate the p value given by:

$p_v = P(\chi^2_{2} >19.72)=5.22x10^{-5}$

And we can find the p value using the following excel code:

"=1-CHISQ.DIST(19.72,2,TRUE)"

Since the p value is lower than the significance level so then we can reject the null hypothesis at 5% of significance, and we can conclude that we have association between the two variables analyzed.

Step-by-step explanation:

A chi-square goodness of fit test "determines if a sample data matches a population".

A chi-square test for independence "compares two variables in a contingency table to see if they are related. In a more general sense, it tests to see whether distributions of categorical variables differ from each another".

Assume the following dataset:

Diag. Alcoholic Undiagnosed Alcoholic Not alcoholic Total

Married 21 37 58 116

Not Married 59 63 42 164

Total 80 100 100 280

Part 1

We need to conduct a chi square test in order to check the following hypothesis:

H0: There is independence between the marital status and the diagnostic of alcoholic

H1: There is association between the marital status and the diagnostic of alcoholic

The level os significance assumed for this case is $\alpha=0.05$

Part 2

The statistic to check the hypothesis is given by:

$\sum_{i=1}^n \frac{(O_i -E_i)^2}{E_i}$

Part 3

The table given represent the observed values, we just need to calculate the expected values with the following formula $E_i = \frac{total col * total row}{grand total}$

And the calculations are given by:

$E_{1} =\frac{80*116}{280}=33.143$

$E_{2} =\frac{100*116}{280}=41.429$

$E_{3} =\frac{100*116}{280}=41.429$

$E_{4} =\frac{80*164}{280}=46.857$

$E_{5} =\frac{100*164}{280}=58.571$

$E_{6} =\frac{100*164}{280}=58.571$

And the expected values are given by:

Diag. Alcoholic Undiagnosed Alcoholic Not alcoholic Total

Married 33.143 41.429 41.429 116

Not Married 46.857 58.571 58.571 164

Total 80 100 100 280

And now we can calculate the statistic:

$\chi^2 = \frac{(21-33.143)^2}{33.143}+\frac{(37-41.429)^2}{41.429}+\frac{(58-41.429)^2}{41.429}+\frac{(59-46.857)^2}{46.857}+\frac{(63-58.571)^2}{58.571}+\frac{(42-58.571)^2}{58.571} =19.72$

Part 4

Now we can calculate the degrees of freedom for the statistic given by:

$df=(rows-1)(cols-1)=(3-1)(2-1)=2$

And we can calculate the p value given by:

$p_v = P(\chi^2_{2} >19.72)=5.22x10^{-5}$

And we can find the p value using the following excel code:

"=1-CHISQ.DIST(19.72,2,TRUE)"

Since the p value is lower than the significance level so then we can reject the null hypothesis at 5% of significance, and we can conclude that we have association between the two variables analyzed.

7 0

4 years ago

The team's combined score was 0. What was Travis's score

Pavlova-9 [17]

Answer:

Sorry but we need more info.

Step-by-step explanation:

:)

8 0

3 years ago

-6-5[-4-(6+12)]+(-5)

Luden [163]

Answer:

99

Step-by-step explanation:

-6-5[-4-(6+12)]+(-5)

Following PEMDAS

We work the parentheses from the inside out

-6-5[-4-(18)]+(-5)

-6-5[-22]+(-5)

Now we multiply

-6+110 -5

Now we add and subtract from left to right

104 -5

99

6 0

3 years ago

Please help asap please please asap help (As soon as possible

kvv77 [185]

Yeah uh don’t click that link it’s under a lot of questions

6 0

3 years ago