Answer:
Multiple causes took place that eventually caused many colonists to go against Great Britain.
Explanation:
By 1774, the year leading up to the Revolutionary War, there were many causes that continued to pile up. Parliament had been passing laws placing taxes on the colonists in America. There had been the Sugar Act in 1764, the Stamp Act the following year, and a variety of other laws that were meant to get money from the colonists for Great Britain. The colonists didn't like these laws.
Great Britain was passing these laws because of the French and Indian War, which had ended in 1763. That war, which had been fought in North America, left Great Britain with a huge debt that had to be paid. Parliament said it had fought the long and costly war to protect its American subjects from the powerful French in Canada. Parliament said it was right to tax the American colonists to help pay the bills for the war.
Most colonists disagreed. Parliament was elected by people living in England, and the colonists felt that lawmakers living in England could not understand the colonists' needs. The colonists felt that since they did not take part in voting for members of Parliament in England they were not represented in Parliament. So Parliament did not have the right to take their money by imposing taxes. "No taxation without representation" became the American rallying cry.
Dictator that it what its called
<span>Rawls' philosophy that inequalities are justified if they benefit the position of the least-advantaged person is known as the: difference principle.
For example, let's say that there is a running competition between grown man and young boy. But, the grown man has to run carrying a 50kgs of weight on his shoulder.
In this case, even though there is inequality in the race, it's justified because it benefit the least-advantage person(the young boy)</span>
In social networks it is common to use a different language, this happens so that one does not need to type very large texts and so that the message is understood, but it does not need to be necessarily clear about the message.
The great advantage of this is the speed with which the messages can spread, but on the contrary when their real meaning cannot be understood this causes mistakes and problems with the interpretation of the message.
