Global warming is an ongoing issue for debate. True or False? Question 2 options: True False

Chemistry

2 answers:

Ksju [112]2 years ago

6 0

Answer:

True

Explanation:

It is because global warming is a common issue that people debate.

Romashka-Z-Leto [24]2 years ago

5 0

Answer:

(True) The answer to that is yes, global warming is a hotly debated topic.

Explanation:

As a matter of political controversy, global warming is often viewed from different political perspectives. Which is why it is still an issue. (In 1988, global warming became a topic of discussion.) A number of climate change-related phenomena are occurring due to climate change, including rising temperatures, droughts and wildfires, changing precipitation patterns, glaciers melting, and rising sea levels.

Hope this helps! :D

You might be interested in

What would you ask the scientists that came up with the big bang theory?

faust18 [17]

Answer:

What is the name of the drug you were talking at the time of coming up with this theory please?

4 0

2 years ago

Which of the following is a correct description of a double bond between two carbon atoms

kicyunya [14]

A double bond between carbon atoms is longer than a triple bond between carbon atoms.

5 0

3 years ago

Analyze the role coefficients in a chemical reaction play in stoichiometry

kumpel [21]

Answer:

This is known as the coefficient factor

Explanation:The balanced equation makes it possible to convert information about one reactant or product to quantitative data about another element.

7 0

2 years ago

In this reaction: Mg (s) + I₂ (s) → MgI₂ (s) If 2.68 moles of Mg react with 3.56 moles of I₂, and 1.76 moles of MgI₂ form, what

melomori [17]

Answer:

$Y=65.7\%$

Explanation:

Hello,

In this case, for the given chemical reaction, we first identify the limiting reactant by noticing that due to the 1:1 mole ratio for magnesium to iodine the reacting moles must the same, nevertheless, there are only 2.68 moles of magnesium versus 3.56 moles of iodine, for that reason, magnesium is the limiting reactant, so the theoretical turns out:

$n_{MgI_2}^{theoretical}=2.68molMg*\frac{1molMgI_2}{1molMg} =2.68molMgI_2$