Answer:
No DB is not a perpendicular bisector of AC
Step-by-step explanation:
This is because as AC is a straight line it's angle degree is 180 which when bisected by DB becomes,
180 ÷ 2 = 90
On both the angles i.e <BDC = <NDA = 90°
To make it a perpendicular bisector but
<BDC is not equal to <NDA is not equal to 90°.
Hence, DB is not a perpendicular bisector of line AC.
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
Show that if 3x – 7 = 5, then x = 4.
Here, our given statement is 3x – 7 = 5, and we're asked to prove x = 4.
x=4
Statements Reasons
1. 3x – 7 = 5 Given
2. 3x – 7 + 7 = 5 + 7 Addition of 7 to equation (1)
3. 3x + 0 = 5 + 7 Substitution of –7 + 7 = 0 into (2)
4. 3x = 5 + 7 Substitution of 3x + 0 = 3x into (3)
5. 3x = 12 Substitution of 5 + 7 = 12 into (4)
6. 3x⁄3 = 12⁄3 Dividing equation (5) by 3
7. x = 12⁄3 Substitution of 3x⁄3 = x into (6)
8. x = 4 Substitution of 12⁄3 = 4 into (7)
Is there such a thing as being too descriptive? Yep, and that was it, since over half the proof was devoted to telling the reader how to do arithmetic. We'll typically take numerical computation for granted, and write proofs like this:
4 4/7 feet is it's simplest form because 20 I'm chea equal 1.67 feet and 7 feet equals 84 inches so do 20 × 4 = 80 then you would have 4 left over and turn that into 4/7
The acute right angle means, the right angle is an acute angle so therefor it is not possible, because it is an acute angle not a right angle. Hope this helps :)
The exponential function shown in the graph is 3^x, so (1/2)3^x is a shrink of it.
Selection B is appropriate.
