$700,935 and debit discount on notes payable a working year is the correct answer among the group of choices.
<h3>What are debits exactly?</h3>
A debit is an accounting system item that demonstrates a gain in assets and a decrease in liabilities. Debits and credits are the two categories into which the entries fall in basic accounting. Debits are always offset by credit entries.
<h3>Is debit debt or credit?</h3>
A credit increases the balance in a liabilities account whereas a debit decreases it. In this manner, the credit for the loan would equal the debit for the cash on hand account, increasing the long-term debt account by the same amount.
To know more about Debit visit:
brainly.com/question/12269231
#SPJ4
Answer and Explanation:
According to the scenario, computation of the given data are as follow:-
A).Present Value of the Cash Flow for the Lump Sum Payout
= Prize of Lottery Amount × (1 -Tax Rate)
= $506,300 × (1 - 0.46)
= $506,300 × 0.54
= $273,402
B).Present Value of the Cash Flows for Annuity Payout is
= Annuity Payment × (1 - Tax Rate) × PVIFA 8%,20 Years × (1 + Rate of Return)
= $37,000 × (1 - 0.26) × 9.8181 × (1 + .08)
= $37,000 × 0.74 × 9.8181 × 1.08
= $290,325
c). According to the analysis, $290,325 is more than the $273,402, So he should be chooses option (b) $290,325 as a payout option.
1. In the criminal justice system, John can temporarily put Jack in custody pending the arrival of the police. Jack was not detained for a period longer than five minutes and not for a civil wrong.
Thus, in this lawsuit for the tort of unlawful imprisonment, Jack will lose because he committed a crime. He cannot apply a civil law to a criminal case.
2. Adriana is correct that her personal assets cannot be reached in this lawsuit brought by the shareholders of DEF, Inc. because SLA Accountants, LLP is a limited liability partnership and not just an ordinary partnership.
A limited liability partnership, like a limited liability company, offers members limited liability. However, the shareholders of DEF, Inc. may decide to sue Adriana personally.
3. Andrew is wrong because the car handed over by Sam was not a completed inter-vivos gift. The transfer was not absolute but conditional upon Sam not returning from the Middle East.
As a conditional transfer of gift, the vesting of the ownership interest created by the transfer depends on the fulfillment of a condition.
Thus, since the transfer condition did not materialize, Andrew should return the car to Sam in good faith.
Learn more about inter vivos gifts and limited liability partnerships here brainly.com/question/14767795 and brainly.com/question/1166757
